Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 23.
Published in final edited form as: Circulation. 2020 Dec 3;143(8):790–804. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.047987

Figure 3. Spontaneous Type 1 MI by Strategy and by MI Definitions Management after Cath by Invasive Strategy vs Conservative Strategy.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Spontaneous type 1 MI events were significantly more frequent in the conservative strategy regardless of type of revascularization procedure performed or MI definition used. Group differences are significant at p<0.001 and individual pairwise comparisons to the CON group are significant at p <0.001 after adjustment for multiple comparisons. CON = conservative strategy; INV-PCI = invasive strategy patients that received PCI; INV-CABG = invasive strategy patients that received coronary bypass surgery; INV-None = invasive strategy patients that did not receive coronary revascularization (59.6% had non-obstructive coronary disease at catheterization).