Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 30;59(4):405–417. doi: 10.1007/s13353-018-0459-0

Table 2.

RP-HPLC analysis of methylation level (%) in leaves of five tolerant (T) and five non-tolerant (NT) triticale lines after exposure to different Al3+ concentrations

Line C (0 ppm) S (15 ppm) S (20 ppm) S (30 ppm) Δ (S-C) (15 ppm) Δ (S-C) (20 ppm) Δ (S-C) (30 ppm)
L438 NT 23.55 23.65 23.15 23.63 0.09 − 0.40 0.08
L444 NT 23.37 23.07 23.75 23.56 − 0.29 0.38 0.19
L455 NT 23.37 23.36 23.32 23.19 − 0.01 − 0.04 − 0.17
L461 NT 23.15 23.35 23.26 23.22 0.20 0.11 0.06
L203 NT 23.90 23.83 24.02 NA − 0.07 0.12 NA
 ANOVA (NT lines) 23.47 23.45 23.53 23.41 − 0.02 0.03 0.04
 Tukey’s grouping C, S, and Δ (S-C) a a a a a a a
L195 T 22.95 23.26 23.25 NA 0.31 0.30 NA
L198 T 23.85 24.13 24.17 24.23 0.29 0.32 0.39
L201 T 23.67 23.87 24.02 23.87 0.20 0.41 0.19
L210 T 23.26 23.36 23.29 23.42 0.10 0.02 0.15
L451 T 23.61 23.77 23.78 23.90 0.16 0.17 0.28
 ANOVA (T lines) 23.47 23.67 23.72 23.85 0.21 0.24 0.25
 Tukey’s grouping C, S, and Δ (S-C) a a a a a a a

One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s contrasts (α = 0.05) of DNA methylation changes in three replicate experiments. Mean values (%) that do not share a letter are significantly different. C and S represent control and stressed conditions, respectively. Δ (S-C) reflects the methylation difference between C and S

NA, not analyzed