Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 22;31(4):869–874.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.11.013
Row Measure Comparison t df p Cohen’s d Mean Diff 95% CI
1 probability 1 feature: 0° versus 45° 4.381 23 < 0.001 0.894 9.754 5.149, 14.359
2 probability 1 feature: 45° versus 90° 4.626 23 < 0.001 0.944 10.564 5.84, 15.289
3 probability 1 feature: 90° versus 135° 6.475 23 < 0.001 1.322 10.475 7.129, 13.822
4 probability 2 features: 0° versus 45° −4.804 23 < 0.001 0.981 −9.153 −13.094, −5.212
5 probability 2 features: 45° versus 90° −3.375 23 .003 0.689 −7.754 −12.508, −3.001
6 probability 2 features: 90° versus 135° −3.665 23 .001 0.748 −6.598 −10.323, −2.874
7 probability 3 features: 0° versus 45° −5.042 23 < 0.001 1.029 −3.387 −4.777, −1.998
8 probability 3 features: 45° versus 90° −3.064 23 .005 0.625 −2.345 −3.928, −0.762
9 probability 3 features: 90° versus 135° 0.681 23 .503 0.139 0.595 −1.214, 2.405
10 probability 4 features: 0° versus 45° −2.382 23 .026 0.486 −0.875 −1.634, −0.115
11 probability 4 features: 45° versus 90° −3.064 23 .005 0.625 −3.547 −5.942, −1.152
12 probability 4 features: 90° versus 135° −5.63 23 < 0.001 1.149 −5.432 −7.428, −3.436

Each row shows the results of a within-subject paired t-test.