Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 22;11(2):e044222. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044222

Table 2.

Summary of findings table

Nicotine-containing Electronic cigarettes (ENDS) vs Nicotine Replacement Therapies (NRT) for smoking cessation
Population: current smokers at enrolment into trials
Intervention: Nicotine-containing e-cigarettes
Comparison: Nicotine-replacement therapies
Outcomes
ENDS as compared with NRT
Relative effect
(95% CI)
No of participants (studies) Quality of the evidence (GRADE) Comments
Cessation RR 1.42 (0.97 to 2.09) 1800 (5 studies) ⊕⊕OO*†
low
Smoking reduction
Proportion of people decreasing cigarette consumption by 50%
Mean decrease in cigarettes per day
RR 1.25 (0.79 to 1.98)
MD 1.11 (-0.41 to 2.63)
1460 (4 studies)
633 (3 studies)
⊕⊕OO*†
low
⊕⊕OO*†
low
Adverse events (AEs) RR 0.96 (0.76 to 1.20) 758 (4 studies) ⊕OOO*†‡
Very low
No severe AEs related to investigated products were reported
Withdrawal symptoms Summary data not available 4 studies ⊕OOO*†‡
Very low
Withdrawal measures included Minnesota Nicotine Withdrawal Scale, QSU scores, frequency of urge and strength of urge score and prespecified symptoms of depressed mood, irritability, restlessness and hunger
Acceptance of therapy Summary data not available 4 studies ⊕OOO*†‡
Very low
Acceptance defined as wanting to recommend product to friends, helpfulness, taste, satisfaction, psychological reward, enjoyment of sensation, aversion, and ability to reduce craving depending on study

GRADE Working Group grades of evidence.

High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.

Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.

Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.

Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

*Downgraded one level because of risk of bias.

†Downgraded one level because of heterogeneity.

‡Downgraded one level because of imprecision of results.

GRADE, Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation; MD, mean difference; QSU, Questionnaire on Smoking Urges; RR, rate ratio.