Table 6.
Study | Location | Air Quality Assessment | Sample Size | Socio-economic Data | Socio-economic Measure | Results | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mannino et al. (2001) | US, nationwide | Serum cotinine sample. | 5653 children | Study questionnaire |
|
|
|
Berman et al. (2003) | Los Angeles, US | Parental-reported† home exposure, validated with home nicotine monitor. | 242 children | Study questionnaire | Parental educational attainment. | Children with parents who had < high school education had elevated levels of indoor ETS exposure (130.5 h per week) vs. ≥ high school education (109.9 h). | p < 0.05 |
Jurado et al. (2004) | Granada, Spain | Parental-reported home exposure and urinary cotinine sample. | 115 children | Study questionnaire |
|
|
|
Scherer et al. (2004) | Ausburg, Germany | Parental-reported home exposure and urinary cotinine samples. | 1220 children | Study questionnaire | Parental educational attainment. |
|
|
Soliman et al. (2004) | US, nationwide | Parental-reported home exposure. | 15,601 families | Study questionnaire | Parental educational attainment. | Children of mothers who were a high school drop out were almost four times more likely (ORb = 1.18) to be exposed to ETS in the home than the children of mothers with a postgraduate education (OR = 0.28). | p < 0.05 |
Rise et al. (2005) | Norway, nationwide. | Parental-reported home exposure. | 212 households | Study questionnaire | Parental educational attainment. |
|
|
Gonzales et al. (2006) | New Mexico, US | Maternal-reported exposure. | 269 mothers | Study questionnaire |
|
No significant associations were found between educational attainment or occupational status and having a partial or no smoking ban at home. |
|
Bolte et al. (2008) | Bavaria, Germany | Parental-reported home exposure. | 12,422 children | Study questionnaire |
|
|
|
Hughes et al. (2008) | Seoul, Korea | Parental-reported home exposure. | 207 parents | Verbal study questionnaire |
|
|
|
Akhtar et al. (2009) | Scotland, nationwide | Self-reported home exposure and salivary cotinine sample. | 2527 children | Study questionnaire | Family affluence scalec |
|
|
Mantziou et al. (2009) | Athens, Greece | Maternal-reported home exposure. | 614 children | Study questionnaire | Parental educational attainment. | Lower educated fathers were less likely to expose their children to ETS in the house in comparison to their higher educated peers (OR = 0.57 vs 1.0). | p = 0.077 |
Akhtar et al. (2010) | Scotland, nationwide | Self-reported home exposure and salivary cotinine sample. | 2389 children | Study questionnaire |
|
|
All regression models: p < 0.001 |
Alwan et al. (2010) | Leeds, UK | Parental-reported home exposure. | 318 homes | Study questionnaire |
|
|
|
Singh et al. (2010) | US, nationwide. | Parental-reported home exposure. | 90,853 children | Verbal study questionnaire |
|
|
|
Yi et al. (2011) | Korea, nationwide. | Parental-reported home exposure and urinary cotinine samples. | 7059 children | Study questionnaire |
|
|
|
Pisinger et al. (2012) | The Capital Region, Denmark | Parental-reported home exposure. | 21, 985 parents | Study questionnaire | Parental educational attainment. | OR of home exposure likelihood for children of parents with low education = 11.5, vs OR = 0 for high education: It was 11 times more likely for a child to be exposed to ETS at home if the parent had a very low education. | p < 0.001 |
Ren et al. (2012) | Detroit, US | Maternal-reported home exposure. | 399 children | Study questionnaire |
|
|
|
Hawkins & Berkan (2013) | US, nationwide. | Maternal-reported exposure. | 135,278 mothers | Study questionnaire | Maternal educational attainment. | 13.4% of mothers with 16 + years of education smoked in the presence of infants for 1 + hours per day, compared with 28.1% of mothers with 0-11yrs education. | p < 0.05 |
Longman & Passey (2013) | Australia, nationwide | Parental-reported home exposure. | 15,978 households. | Census data | Area-level deprivation index | Children living in areas in the lowest deprivation category were 4x more likely to be exposed to ETS in the home (OR = 1), than children in the highest category (OR = 0.25). | p < 0.05 |
Liao et al. (2014) | Taiwan, statewide | Parental-reported home exposure. | 307 parents | Study questionnaire |
|
|
|
Raisamo et al. (2014) | Finland, nationwide | Self-reported home exposure. | 72,726 adolescents | Study questionnaire | Parental educational attainment. | Paternal educational attainment:
|
Paternal education:
|
Ulbricht et al. (2014) | Mecklenburg, Germany | Parental-reported home exposure. | 3570 households | Study questionnaire |
|
|
|
Shiue (2015) | Scotland, nationwide | Parental-reported home exposure. | 1019 children | Study questionnaire | Area-level deprivation index | Loose rules’ regarding indoor smoking were more prevalent in deprived areas vs. non-deprived areas. | p < 0.001 |
Kuntz & Lampert (2016) | Germany, nationwide | Parental-reported home exposure. | 4455 parents | Study questionnaire | Household deprivation index |
|
|
Yao et al. (2016) | US, nationwide | Self-reported home exposure. | 18,731 children; 44,049 adults | Study questionnaire. |
|
|
|
Nguyen et al. (2018) | Japan, nationwide | Self-reported home exposure. | 2,891 participants | Study questionnaire. |
|
|
|
†In studies which assessed childhood exposure to ETS, levels were determined by parental responses.
*values shown in bold were significant at the 95% confidence level.
NS – not significant.
OR – Odds Ratio
FAS – Family Affluence Scale, derived from measures of car & computer ownership, household occupancy & family holidays.
SES – Socio-economic status
Household poverty status - measured as a ratio of family income to federal poverty level.