Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct;94:250–264. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2020.06.011

Table 4.

Brain regions significantly associated with anosognosia across 2 or more functional modalities

Region N of fMRI studies N of SPECT studies N of FDG-PET studies
 Frontal A M B T A M B T A M B T
 Inferior frontal Gyrus 4 1 5↓ 1 1 2↓
 Superior frontal Gyrus 1 1↓ 1 1↓ 1 1↓
 Middle/medial frontal Gyrus 1 1↓ 1 1↓
 Prefrontal cortex (PFC)
 Orbitofrontal 1 1↓✝ 1 1↓✝ 1 1 2↓✝
 Dorsolateral PFC




1


1↓✝
1


1↓
Temporal
 Medial temporal lobe


2
2↓
1


1↓
1


1↓
Cingulate cortex
 Anterior cingulate cortex 1 1 2↓ 1 1↓ 2 2↓
 Posterior cingulate cortex


1✝
1↓✝
1


1↑


1✝
1↓✝
Insular
 Insula


1
1↓




1


1↓
None
 None 1 1 2 1 1

A = Anosognosia study, M = Metacognition study, B = Study using both anosognosia and metacognition measures, T = Total N of studies.

Key: FDG-PET, fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography; fMRI = functional magnetic resonance imaging

↓ = negative—decreased blood flow/glucose metabolism associated with worse anosognosia/metacognition scores.

↑ = positive correlation—increased blood flow/glucose metabolism associated with worse anosognosia/metacognition score.

Perrotin et al. (2015) found significance across FDG-PET & fMRI.