Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 23;21:74. doi: 10.1186/s12906-021-03249-7

Table 3.

Inhibition zone in diameter of pathogenic microbes on agar disc diffusion, KMU, 2020

Scientific name Concentration Inhibition zone in diameter (mm)
Gram positive bacteria Gram negative bacteria Fungi
S. aureus E. faecalis E.coli K. pneumoniae C. albicans
Mg/ml μl/disc ATCC MRSA ATCC MDR ATCC MDR ATCC MDR ATCC Sample
C. englerianum 100 15 16 ± .0.1 15 ± 0.4 18 ± 0.9 17 ± 1.0 9 ± 0.3 13 ± 1.4 16 ± 2.0 11 ± 0.1 14 ± 1.1
30 24 ± 3.0 25 ± 0.8** 27 ± 1.3 27 ± 1.5# 20 ± 0.7 21 ± 0.2 26 ± 0.8 26 ± 0.9¥ 21 ± 0.7 9 ± 0.3
E. depauperata 100 15 15 ± .0.6 14 ± 0.7 16 ± 2.0 17 ± 0.3 17 ± 0.1 18 ± 0.7 10 ± 0.9
30 23 ± 2.4 23 ± 1.0* 26 ± 0.9 26 ± 0.5# 13 ± 0.1 12 ± 0.4 25 ± 1.2 25 ± 0.7¥ 22 ± 1.1 23 ± 0.7
L. adoensis 100 15 16 ± .1.2 12 ± 0.1 11 ± 1.1 14 ± 0.1 10 ± 0.7 14 ± 0.2 20 ± 0.6 20 ± 0.3 9 ± 0.3
30 22 ± 2.4 21 ± 1.8 21 ± 0.5 21 ± 1.5 21 ± 2.1 21 ± 0.3 27 ± 0.1 27 ± 0.7¥ 11 ± 0.9 20 ± 0.1
D.penninervi m 100 15 16 ± .0.3 14 ± 0.1 16 ± 0.4 15 ± 0.7 20 ± 0.7 19 ± 1.0 18 ± 0.3 16 ± 0.2 13 ± 0.3 9 ± 1.6
30 21 ± 0.5 23 ± 2.0* 21 ± 0.1 20 ± 1.0 25 ± 0.8 23 ± 0.1 23 ± 0.7 21 ± 0.4 20 ± 0.9 19 ± 0.4
R. abyssinicus 100 15 14 ± 0.9 9 ± 0.8 15 ± 1.1 11 ± 1.0 11 ± 1.0 9 ± 0.7 10 ± 0.2 14 ± 0.4
30 22 ± 0.6 20 ± 0.4 25 ± 0.4 19 ± 1.1 10 ± 0.8 12 ± 0.1 20 ± 0.1 19 ± 0.6 21 ± 0.5 21 ± 0.1
C. pustulatus 100 15 12 ± 1.0 12 ± 0.2 12 ± 0.8 16 ± 1.2 15 ± 0.2 10 ± 0.8 10 ± 0.9 11 ± 0.8 12 ± 0.8 10 ± 0.1
30 21 ± 0.8 21 ± 0.8 23 ± 0.5 22 ± 0.8# 23 ± 0.4 18 ± 0.9 21 ± 1.0 21 ± 0.4 18 ± 0.1 18 ± 0.8
Modern drug 22 ± 2.0Ce 12 ± 1.9Ce 22 ± 3.0C 13 ± 1.2C 26 ± 2.1C 15 ± 2.3C 24 ± 1.2C 14 ± 1.9C 22 ± 0.3F 21 ± 1.3F

Mean ± SD, NT Not tested, − = No inhibition zone, C Ciprofloxacin, Ce Cefoxitin, F Ketoconazole, MDR < 16 mm, ATCC > 21 mm *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 compared to cefoxitin treated MRSA. #P < 0.05 compared to modern drug treated E. faecalis, ¥ P < 0.05 compared to modern drug treated K. pneumoniae