Table 9:
Impacts of the HSCT program on youth-level mediators
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dependent variable: | Currently enrolled in an educational institute | Number of days attended school in the week before the interviewƚ | Did any work as a casual/part-time/maricho laborer in the last 12 months | Currently married/co-habiting/has a partner |
| Treatment | 0.061 (0.044) | 0.130 (0.252) | 0.045 (0.060) | −0.020 (0.041) |
| 12-months | −0.013 (0.071) | 0.480 (0.291) | −0.069 (0.051) | 0.052 (0.062) |
| 48-months | 0.075** (0.034) | 0.156 (0.259) | −0.011 (0.052) | −0.004 (0.046) |
| 12-month treatment impact | 0.018 (0.077) | −0.167 (0.329) | −0.029 (0.061) | −0.007 (0.066) |
| 48-month treatment impact | −0.008 (0.044) | −0.227 (0.315) | −0.125** (0.063) | −0.012 (0.049) |
| Observations | 4,034 | 1,930 | 4,025 | 4,041 |
| R-squared | 0.355 | 0.030 | 0.110 | 0.264 |
| Baseline mean of dependent variable | 0.606 | 4.250 | 0.245 | 0.147 |
Robust standard errors presented in parentheses are adjusted for clustering at the level of the ward of residence.
***
p<0.01
**
p<0.05
*
p<0.1.
Controls include youth age and gender, and baseline values of the following household characteristics - log household size, main respondent age, gender, education and marital status, household demographic composition and indicators for the province of residence. Weights are applied to approximate effects for all eligible youth in the study regions.
ƚ
In examining this outcome, the sample is restricted to those attending an educational institute that was not closed for holiday during the reference period.