Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Feb 24.
Published in final edited form as: World Dev. 2020 Jul 1;134:105037. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105037

Table A8:

Impacts of the HSCT program on other caregiver/household-level mediators

(1) (2) (3) (4)

Dependent variable: Caregiver is married or co-habiting Household size Number of female adults (>=25 years) Number of male adults (>=25 years)
Treatment −0.022 (0.027) 0.224 (0.176) 0.000 (0.040) −0.047 (0.036)
12-months 0.014 (0.027) −0.117 (0.074) 0.017 (0.015) 0.002 (0.018)
48-months 0.001 (0.026) 2.100*** (0.239) 0.048 (0.031) −0.024 (0.034)
12-month treatment impact 0.002 (0.032) −0.043 (0.096) 0.009 (0.022) −0.033 (0.025)
48-month treatment impact −0.005 (0.032) −0.431* (0.255) −0.038 (0.037) 0.041 (0.040)
Observations 4,747 5,048 5,048 5,048
R-squared 0.268 0.157 0.018 0.292
Baseline mean of dependent variable 0.560 6.215 1.144 0.647

Robust standard errors presented in parentheses are adjusted for clustering at the level of the ward of residence.

***

p<0.01

**

p<0.05

*

p<0.1.

Controls in column 1 include caregivers’ gender and age, and baseline values of the following household characteristics - log household size, main respondent education, household demographic composition and indicators for the province of residence. Columns 2–4 control for baseline values of the following household characteristics – main respondent age, gender, education and marital status, and indicators for the province of residence (baseline demographic characteristics are omitted since the outcome variables are related to household composition). Weights are applied to approximate effects for all eligible households in the study regions. The sample is restricted to household that had youth members at baseline.