Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 17;2021:6618559. doi: 10.1155/2021/6618559

Table 4.

Genomic comparisons between Burkholderia cepacia COPS and B. cepacia strains based on genome comparisons and multilocus sequence analysis.

Genome comparisons Multilocus sequence analysis
Strain GC (%) ANIm (%) ANIb (%) dDDH (%) Tetra Locus Identity (%) Allele
Burkholderia cepacia RB-39 65.91 93.68 91.82 51.00 0.99738 atpD 100 atpD 235
Burkholderia cepacia DDS 7H-2 67.05 92.01 90.20 43.30 0.99559 gltB 100 gltB 707
Burkholderia cepacia DWS 16B-4 67.07 92.01 90.24 43.30 0.99561 gyrB 99.7797 gyrB 1041
Burkholderia cepacia LMG 16656 66.88 92.07 90.08 43.60 0.99553 lepA 99.4962 lepA 3
Burkholderia cepacia MSMB1302 66.81 96.22 95.19 67.00 0.99924 phaC 99.4805 phaC 279
Burkholderia cepacia LK13 66.47 98.72 98.04 87.80 0.99948 recA 100 recA 1
Burkholderia cepacia NBRC 14074 66.67 97.56 96.86 77.20 0.99929 trpB 100 trpB 21
Burkholderia cepacia NCTC10743 66.60 97.56 96.86 77.10 0.99932
Burkholderia cepacia ATCC 25416 66.58 97.56 96.87 77.10 0.99935
Burkholderia cepacia GG4 66.68 91.30 88.62 36.80 0.99608
Burkholderia cepacia JBK9 66.82 92.35 90.59 45.00 0.99686
Burkholderia cepacia MSMB591WGS 66.43 98.71 98.13 87.40 0.99932
Burkholderia cepacia MSMB1224WGS 66.86 97.94 97.23 80.70 0.99892
Burkholderia cepacia LO6 66.99 89.93 86.75 36.20 0.97175
Burkholderia sp. LK4 66.46 98.78 98.05 87.80 0.99950
Burkholderia reimsis BE51 66.37 98.72 98.05 86.50 0.99938
Burkholderia lata LK27 66.76 98.53 96.91 87.90 0.99926

Bold values based on ANI, dDDH, and TETRA (threshold of ≥ 96%, ≥ 70%, and TETRA > 0.999%, respectively) represent that strains belong to the same genomic species, whereas in multilocus sequence analysis, bold values represent new alleles of housekeeping genes within Burkholderia spp.