Table 5.
Lactobacillus strain | Adhesion ± SD to different surfaces * | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
polystyrene | glass | gelatine | collagen | porcine mucus | |
paracasei ŁOCK 1091 | 1.01 ± 0.15 + | 2.44 ± 0.14 ++ | 7.16 ± 0.16 +++ | 1.16 ± 0.14 + | 1.87 ± 0.07 + |
pentosus ŁOCK 1094 | 1.33 ± 0.12 + | 1.18 ± 0.27 + | 2.92 ± 0.06 +++ | 1.23 ± 0.15 + | 2.06 ± 0.10 ++ |
plantarum ŁOCK 0860 | 1.21 ± 0.10 + | 2.15 ± 0.12 ++ | 8.31 ± 0.28 +++ | 1.34 ± 0.13 + | 2.70 ± 0.09 ++ |
reuteri ŁOCK 1092 | 1.14 ± 0.14 + | 2.32 ± 0.16 ++ | 5.50 ± 0.13 +++ | 1.20 ± 0.14 + | 2.02 ± 0.08 ++ |
rhamnosus ŁOCK 1087 | 0.95 ± 0.08 - | 1.95 ± 0.10 + | 6.03 ± 0.24 +++ | 1.04 ± 0.15 + | 2.10 ± 0.12 ++ |
*Ability of Lactobacillus spp. to adhere to different surfaces and thus forming biofilm was evaluated based on do Carmo et al. (2016). Adherence of the tested sample (Asample) was compared with adherence of the control (Acontrol) and strains were classified as follows: “-“non-adherent – Asample < Acontrol; “+” weakly adherent – Acontrol < Asample ≤ (2 × Acontrol); “++” moderately adherent – (2 × Acontrol) < Asample ≤ (4 × Acontrol); “+++” strongly adherent – (4 × Acontrol) < Asample