Table 2.
Location | Sample | RRV positivea | RRV negative | % positive | Odds-ratios | 2.5% CI | 97.5% CI | z-value | p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Estuarine | Overall | 73 | 16 | 82.02 | 0.82 | 0.39 | 1.82 | 0.49 | 0.62 |
Female | 41 | 9 | 82.00 | 0.99 | 0.36 | 2.98 | 0.01 | 0.99 | |
Male | 32 | 7 | 82.05 | 1.01 | 0.34 | 2.76 | 0.01 | 0.99 | |
Lacustrine | Overall | 83 | 15 | 84.69 | 1.21 | 0.55 | 2.57 | 0.49 | 0.62 |
Female | 54 | 9 | 85.71 | 1.24 | 0.38 | 3.88 | 0.38 | 0.71 | |
Male | 29 | 6 | 82.86 | 0.81 | 0.26 | 2.61 | 0.38 | 0.71 |
Comparison of seroprevalence rates between environments was performed using data only for animals for which their location could be confirmed (n = 187) after accounting for relocated individuals and animals with too few position locations (n < 5) to confirm their assignment to a particular environment.
aAn animal sampled multiple times was considered seropositive if the animal returned a positive test result during any individual sampling event.