Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 24;4(2):e210070. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.0070

Table 2. Adjusted Risk Differences for Probability of Comprehensive CVRF Assessment.

Comprehensive CVRF assessment Adjusted risk difference, % (95% CI)a P value
Race
White −5.7 (−6.4 to −5.0) <.001
Non White 1 [Reference]
Age, y
≤60 1 [Reference]
61-65 2.2 (13-3.1) <.001
66-70 2.4 (1.5-3.4) <.001
71-75 1.5 (0.3-2.7) .01
>75 −4.3 (−5.6 to −2.9) <.001
National Poverty Index above median −0.6 (−1.2 to 0.1) .08
Disease stage
Low risk 1 [Reference]
Intermediate risk 0.0 (−0.8 to 0.8) .96
High risk −1.3 (−2.1 to −0.5) .002
Metastatic or node positive −7.4 (−8.9 to −5.8) <.001
Baseline year
2010-2011 1 [Reference]
2012-2013 6.3 (5.4-7.2) <.001
2014-2015 11.1 (10.2-12.0) <.001
2016-2017 15.2 (14.4-16.1) <.001
ASCVD/ADT statusb
ASCVD−/ADT− 1 [Reference]
ASCVD+/ADT− 10.4 (9.5-11.3) <.001
ASCVD+/ADT+ 12.3 (10.9-13.7) <.001
ASCVD−/ADT+ 3.0 (2.1-3.9) <.001

Abbreviations: ADT, androgen deprivation therapy; ASCVD, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; CVRF, cardiovascular risk factor.

a

Risk difference coefficients are interpreted as absolute percent difference in the probability of outcome. All coefficients were adjusted for other covariates in the model.

b

ASCVD−/ADT− indicates no history of ASCVD, not receiving ADT; ASCVD+/ADT−, history of ASCVD, not receiving ADT; ASCVD+/ADT+, history of ASCVD, receiving ADT; and ASCVD−/ADT+, no history of ASCVD, receiving ADT.