Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 24;19:27. doi: 10.1186/s12964-020-00703-w

Table 1.

Comparison of AblΔIDR rescue of adult and embryonic viability with other Abl constructs

Construct Residues changed or deleted Percent rescue of adult viability in abl4/Df(3L)st-j7 (normalized to WT)* Probability that viability is higher than adults with no transgene Probability that rescue is better or worse than that by Abl WT Probability that rescue is better or worse than that by Abl ΔCR1 Percent rescue of progeny embryonic viabilty of abl4/Df(3L)st-j7 X abl4/+** Probability that rescue is worse than that by Abl WT Probability that rescue is better or worse than that by Abl ΔCR1 Percent rescue of progeny embryonic viabilty of abl4 maternal germ line clone X abl4/+*** Probability that rescue is worse than that of Abl WT Probability that rescue is better or worse than that of ablMZ Probability that rescue is better or worse than that by Abl ΔCR1
No Transgene N/A 20.4 (n = 145)# N/A p < 0.0001 p = 0.4474 N/A N/A N/A 8.2% (n = 527)# p < 0.0001 n/a p = 0.0246
Abl WT N/A 100% (n = 386)# p < 0.0001 N/A p ≤ 0.0001 89.4 (n = 901)# N/A p < 0.0001 38.9% (n = 540)# n/a p < 0.0001 p < 0.0001
Abl∆IDR 679–1398 48.1% (n = 223) p = 0.0075 p < 0.0001 p = 0.3064 26.2% (n = 378) p < 0.0001 p < 0.0001 1.1% (n = 569) p < 0.0001 p < 0.0001 p < 0.0001
AblΔFABD 1418–1520 140% (n = 173)# p < 0.0001 p < 0.0001 p < 0.0001 97.1 (n = 362)# p < 0.0001 p < 0.0001 34.6% (n = 515)# p = 0.16 p < 0.0001 p < 0.0001
AblKDΔFABD K417N 1418–1520 81.5% (n = 585)# p < 0.0001 p = 0.0108 p = 0.0029 52.1 (n = 259)# p < 0.0001 p = 0.7268 28.2 (n = 560)# p = 0.0002 p < 0.0001 p < 0.0001
AblΔCR1 734–789 30.7% (n = 48)# p = 0.4474 p < 0.0001 N/A 53.9 (n = 267)# p < 0.0001 N/A 12.4% (n = 606)# p < 0.0001 p = 0.02 N/A

Comparison of AblΔIDR rescue of adult and embryonic viability in Abl null mutant background with other Abl constructs with statistical significance. A two-tailed Fisher's Exact Test was used to determine p-values of whether there was a statistically significant difference in extent of rescue between genotypes (see Methods)

#Data from Rogers et al. 2016 for comparison; n = number of adults/embryos scored; N/A = not applicable; italics = rescue better than indicated genotype; bold italics = rescue worse than indicated genotype

*Graphed in Fig. 1d

**Graphed in Fig. 1e

***Graphed in Fig. 1f