Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 25;8:8. doi: 10.1186/s40673-021-00130-8

Table 4.

Risk of Bias Classification

Risk of Bias High Risk Low Risk Uncertain Risk
Random sequence generation

Dongmei et al., 2011 [19]

Jin et al., 2013 [20]

Tsai et el., 2017 [21]

None None
Allocation concealment

Dongmei et al., 2011 [19]

Jin et al., 2013 [20]

Tsai et el., 2017 [21]

None None
Blinding of participants and professionals

Dongmei et al., 2011 [19]

Jin et al., 2013 [20]

Tsai et el., 2017 [21]

None None
Blinding of outcome evaluators None

Dongmei et al., 2011 [19]

Jin et al., 2013 [20]

Tsai et el., 2017 [21]
Incomplete outcomes data None

Dongmei et al., 2011 [19]

Jin et al., 2013 [20]

Tsai et el., 2017 [21]

None
Selective outcome reporting None

Dongmei et al., 2011 [19]

Jin et al., 2013 [20]

Tsai et el., 2017 [21]

None

The risk of bias was graded for each domain as high, low, or unclear. For incomplete outcome data in individual studies, we stipulated a low risk of bias for a loss to follow-up of less than 10% and a difference of less than 5% in missing data between the intervention/exposure and control groups