Table 10.
Wilcoxon signed-rank test: proposed ensemble versus individual classifiers on Cleveland dataset
| RF | LR | SVM | ELM | KNN | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E | |||||
| Z-value | − 2.668 | − 2.312 | − 2.655 | − 2.810 | − 2.803 |
| p value | |||||
| Precision | |||||
| Z-value | − 2.533 | − 2.318 | − 2.671 | − 2.814 | − 2.809 |
| p value | |||||
| Recall | |||||
| Z-value | − 2.668 | − 2.173 | − 2.524 | − 2.668 | − 2.668 |
| p value | |||||
| G-mean | |||||
| Z-value | − 2.666 | − 2.310 | − 2.703 | − 2.803 | − 2.803 |
| p value | |||||
| MC | |||||
| Z-value | − 2.668 | − 2.312 | − 2.655 | − 2.810 | − 2.803 |
| p value | |||||
| Specificity | |||||
| Z-value | − 1.892 | − 1.696 | − 2.316 | − 2.521 | − 2.553 |
| p value | 0.094 | 0.101 | |||
| AUC | |||||
| Z-value | − 2.521 | − 2.310 | − 2.666 | − 2.803 | − 2.803 |
| p value | |||||
The value of Wilcoxon statistics after standardization
,