Table 5.
Marginal effects from logistic regression models: factors associated with choosing a private sector provider vs. a public sector provider stratified by type of care
| Pr(Private) | Outpatient | Inpatient | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marginal effect | SE | p-value | Marginal effect | SE | p-value | |
| Gender | ||||||
| Male | Ref. | Ref. | ||||
| Female | −0.025 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.034 | 0.04 | 0.41 |
| Age | ||||||
| 0 to 5 | Ref. | Ref. | ||||
| 6 to 20 | −0.003 | 0.02 | 0.88 | −0.042 | 0.07 | 0.52 |
| 21 to 40 | −0.005 | 0.02 | 0.78 | −0.018 | 0.06 | 0.78 |
| 41 to 60 | −0.016 | 0.02 | 0.37 | −0.096 | 0.07 | 0.14 |
| > 60 | − 0.011 | 0.02 | 0.62 | −0.024 | 0.07 | 0.73 |
| Household wealth quintile | ||||||
| Poorest | Ref. | Ref. | ||||
| Poorer | 0.001 | 0.02 | 0.97 | −0.010 | 0.07 | 0.87 |
| Middle | 0.002 | 0.02 | 0.93 | 0.058 | 0.06 | 0.34 |
| Richer | 0.058 | 0.02 | 0.001 | 0.004 | 0.06 | 0.95 |
| Richest | 0.075 | 0.02 | < 0.001 | 0.082 | 0.06 | 0.19 |
| Region | ||||||
| Rural | 0.001 | 0.01 | 0.92 | 0.112 | 0.04 | 0.001 |
| Province | ||||||
| Punjab | Ref. | Ref. | ||||
| Sindh | 0.062 | 0.01 | < 0.001 | 0.053 | 0.04 | 0.14 |
| KP | −0.133 | 0.02 | < 0.001 | −0.185 | 0.04 | < 0.001 |
| Balochistan | − 0.187 | 0.03 | < 0.001 | −0.065 | 0.06 | 0.30 |
| Household size | ||||||
| 1–4 | Ref. | Ref. | ||||
| 5–8 | −0.050 | 0.01 | < 0.001 | 0.028 | 0.04 | 0.53 |
| 9–12 | −0.051 | 0.02 | 0.001 | −0.033 | 0.05 | 0.54 |
| 13+ | −0.060 | 0.03 | 0.03 | −0.026 | 0.07 | 0.72 |
| Type of illness | ||||||
| Communicable | Ref. | Ref. | ||||
| Accident/Injury | −0.107 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.005 | 0.08 | 0.95 |
| Chronic | −0.014 | 0.02 | 0.40 | −0.095 | 0.06 | 0.13 |
| Childbirth | N/A | 0.056 | 0.06 | 0.38 | ||
| Other female reproductive health concerns | −0.053 | 0.03 | 0.08 | 0.159 | 0.08 | 0.05 |
| Other illness | 0.033 | 0.01 | 0.02 | −0.008 | 0.06 | 0.89 |
| N | 6770 | 1199 | ||||
| Pseudo R-squared | 0.06 | 0.06 | ||||