Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Math Biosci. 2019 Dec 11;321:108294. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2019.108294

Figure 1:

Figure 1:

Comparison of R0 values calculated for multivariate normally-distributed (solid line) and log-normally-distributed (dashed line) heterogeneities for differing values of the correlation coefficient, rX1,X3, between the biting rate, X1, and average duration of human infection, X3. X1 and X3 are taken to have means equal to 1 and 5, respectively, and variances Var(X1) = 0.2 and Var(X3) = 4. The value of the susceptibility parameter was fixed at 1 for the entire population. Lines are obtained using the MVN and MVLN formulae (eqns 17 and 18, respectively). The horizontal dashed line denotes the value of R0 if there was no heterogeneity, i.e. obtained using the average values, R0hom. Note that the basic reproductive number is the same for both distributions when the correlation coefficient is equal to zero, and that this is greater than the value R0hom obtained using the average values because of heterogeneity in the biting rate.