Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychosom Med. 2020 Jun;82(5):508–516. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000816

TABLE 3.

Results From Multivariate Regression Models of GR Sensitivity Over Time on Fatigue at 1 Month After IMRT

N Change in Fatigue 95% CI p
Delta GR AUC estimate 74 4.07 (0.60 to 7.53)  .022
Baseline fatigue 0.55 (0.35 to 0.76) <.001
Age −0.26 (−0.57 to 0.04)  .092
Sex 5.94 (−1.19 to 13.07)  .10
HPV status 3.50 (−3.09 to 10.08)  .30
Marital status 3.53 (−3.00 to 10.06)  .29
Smoking history −4.53 (−11.30 to 2.23)  .19
Alcohol history −2.45 (−7.87 to 2.97)  .38
Race −10.23 (−18.43 to −2.03)  .014
Treatment
 Radiation or + surgerya 3.89 (−5.13 to 12.93)  .40
 Radiation + carboplatin/paclitaxela 12.40 (3.09 to 21.73)  .009
BMI −0.10 (−0.72 to 0.53)  .76
Stratified by HPV status adjusted
 Delta GR AUC among HPV positive 39 −0.56 (−5.00 to 3.89)  .81
 Delta GR AUC among HPV negative 35 8.22 (2.916 to 13.53)  .002

GR = glucocorticoid receptor; IMRT = intensive modulated radiation therapy; CI = confidence interval; AUC = area under the curve; HPV = human papillomavirus; BMI = body mass index.

Adjusted models controlled covariates of baseline fatigue, age, sex, marital status, smoking status, alcohol status, race, treatment, body mass index, and/or human papillomavirus status.

a

Compared with radiation + cisplatin.