Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2021 Feb 25;16(2):e0247390. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247390

Application of biochar from crop straw in asphalt modification

Xinli Gan 1,2,*, Wenli Zhang 2
Editor: Andrew R Zimmerman3
PMCID: PMC7906466  PMID: 33630886

Abstract

The objective of this study is to verify the feasibility of using biochar made from crop straw as a bitumen additive to improve some properties of bitumen. The differences between crop straw biochar prepared in a laboratory and commercial charcoal were investigated through scanning electron microscopy and laser particle size analyses. Furthermore, biochar-modified asphalt was prepared using the high-speed shear method, and the penetration, softening point, ductility at 15°C, and apparent viscosity of the asphalt binder with 6% biochar were measured at 120, 135, 150, 160, and 175°C. It was found that both the crop straw biochar and the commercial charcoal consist mainly of C, O, Si, and K, but the C content of crop straw biochar is slightly higher than that of commercial charcoal. The particle size of biochar is smaller than that of commercial charcoal, while the specific surface area is larger. It was determined that the addition of crop straw biochar significantly improved the high-temperature performance of asphalt, and that biochar and commercial charcoal have a similar influence on the high temperature performance of asphalt.

1. Introduction

The planting of crops produces a considerable amount of straw. Survey data reveal that three billion tons of crop straw are produced worldwide, and China alone produces one billion tons of crop straw every year. The most commonly used crop straw production methods are incineration and burial [1]. A statistical analysis showed that in the Chinese mainland only, the annual amount of straw burned is as high as 1.4 billion tons [2]. The burning of straw not only causes serious pollution to the surrounding air [3] but also leads to fire hazards. Additionally, the degradation period is longer, and failure to degrade straw in a timely manner affects the continued cultivation of the land [4]. Therefore, the development of an effective and sustainable way of using crop straw has become an important research and real-world application issue.

The performance of asphalt pavements inevitably degrades under the combined action of loads and the natural environment. During the high-temperature season, asphalt pavements absorb heat, so their temperature increases causing rut and other issues under the repeated action of traffic loads [5]. The repeated action of traffic loads for an extended period of time causes fatigue and ultimately the cracking of asphalt pavements [6,7]. Asphalt ages under the influence of light and temperature; this reduces its cementation ability and negatively affects the durability of asphalt pavements [8]. Owing to the high cost and environmental sensitivity of asphalt pavements, researchers are focusing on improving their durability.

Studies have demonstrated that the addition of charcoal in the form of small particles to the asphalt binder can effectively improve the high-temperature stability, fatigue performance, and aging resistance of asphalt and asphalt mixtures and does not adversely affect other asphalt pavement performance indicators [9,10]. These studies used charcoal prepared from wood in the laboratory and commercial charcoal. Wang [11] showed that with the increase in charcoal content, the asphalt penetration decreased, and the softening point increased.

An effective way of using crop straw is as a source of biochar for asphalt. On the one hand, this reduces the environmental burden due to the improper treatment of these crop straws; on the other hand, it increases the economic value of crops and improves the utilization rate of agricultural products. Furthermore, the addition of biochar can improve the durability and increase the service life of asphalt pavement, reducing construction and maintenance costs over the complete life cycle of the asphalt pavement, which has significant economic and social value.

2. Literature review

Many countries have paid increasing attention to the utilization of crop straw. Doyle et al. [12] studied the economic benefit of the use of straw as a fuel, as raw material for papermaking, and as animal feed, compared to burning the straw in a field. Smuga-Kogut et al. [13] studied the use of buckwheat straw for energy purposes; among other benefits, they found that the production of second-generation bioethanol could enable its wider application and increase the cost-effectiveness of tillage. Shafie et al. [14] investigated the economic feasibility (i.e., operating, capital, and logistic costs) of rice straw co-firing at coal power plants in Malaysia and determined that co-firing rice straw in an existing coal power plant could reduce CO2 emissions. Sun et al. [15] summarized the utilization methods of various types of crop straw, including soil incorporation, open burning, indoor incineration with energy recovery, combined electricity and energy recovery, conventional straw pulping, and a novel type of straw pulping, and analyzed the environmental impact of these methods. Nair et al. [16] studied the production of ethanol, biogas, and high-protein animal feed from wheat straw. Most of the existing utilization methods have specific requirements for straw. For example, the palatability of straw is important for preparing straw into feed. Not all types of straw are eaten by animals, and the use of straw to prepare chemical products has high cost. In this study, we produced biochar powder from straw and used it to prepare asphalt pavement. The advantage of this method is that it is simple and applicable to all straw.

Under low-oxygen conditions above 400°C, crop straw is pyrolyzed, and biochar is produced [17,18]. In recent years, various methods to prepare and utilize biochar from crop straw, e.g., to improve soil, treat sewage, and as fuel, have been explored [1922]. Some researchers have begun to modify asphalt with charcoal powder to improve some of the performances of the asphalt binder. Zhao et al. [23] tested the rheological characteristics, rutting and fatigue performance, and ductility properties of an asphalt binder modified using biochar derived from switchgrass through different types of pyrolysis. They found that biochar could reduce the temperature susceptibility and significantly increase the rutting resistance of the asphalt binder. Renaldo et al. [24] investigated the effect of biochar on the improvement of asphalt aging susceptibility by blending one control binder (PG 64–22) and two bio-modified binders at concentrations of 3% and 6%, respectively; the rheological characteristics of the specimens were then analyzed before and after aging. It was determined that biochar could be used to improve the aging resistance of asphalt binder. Zhen et al. [25] prepared biochar-modified asphalt via the high-speed shear method and conducted laboratory rolling thin film oven tests and 60°C dynamic viscosity tests of the biochar-modified asphalt; they found that biochar could increase the bond capability and resistance to flow deformation of the modified asphalt. Zhang et al. [26] used biochar as a modifier for a petroleum asphalt binder and compared the rheological properties of biochar-modified asphalt binders using different particle sizes and contents with one control and one flake graphite-modified asphalt binder. They found that the biochar-modified asphalts had higher high-temperature rutting resistance and better anti-aging properties than the graphite-modified asphalt, especially for the binders with the smaller and higher-content biochar particles. Wu et al. [27] investigated the complex modulus of biochar converted from straw as an alternative mineral filler in asphalt mastic. They found that the biochar results in an asphalt mastic with higher stiffness compared the conventional granite mineral filler. Wu et al. [28] evaluated the aging susceptibility of asphalt binders modified with biochar and found that the addition of biochar decreased the susceptibility towards aging of the bio-asphalt binders estimated using the rheological aging index.

3. Materials and methods

The asphalt binder used in this study was produced in Maoming, China, and its performance was tested according to the Standard Test Methods of Bitumen and Bituminous Mixtures for Highway Engineering (JTG E20-2011) of China [29], as shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Technical performance of asphalt binder.

Apparent viscosity (135°C)/(mPa·s) Penetration (25°C, 100 g, 5 s)/0.1 mm Softening point (°C) Ductility (5 cm min-1, 15°C)/cm Density at 15°C/(g/cm3)
622.5 75.2 45.6 110.4 1.025

A muffle furnace was used to prepare the crop straw biochar at 700°C. Subsequently, the biochar was ground into powder particles. Finally, the biochar was added to the asphalt binder to prepare biochar-modified asphalt via high-speed cutting.

The preparation process was as follows:

Step 1: remove the soil and other sundries at the root of the straw, and clean it until there are no visible sundries;

Step 2: dry the straw naturally, and cut it into pieces of approximately 5 cm;

Step 3: put the straw in a 105°C blast drying oven, and dry it to a constant weight;

Step 4: the dried straws were placed in a muffle furnace at 450°C for 2 h. The muffle furnaces were sealed to maintain an oxygen-deficit environment, and the biochar was prepared under pyrolytic conditions. After cooling, the biochar was ground to a powder using a grinder.

Step 5: the ground powder was screened using a square sieve with a diameter of 0.075 mm. A biochar powder with particle diameters of less than 0.075 mm was used for standby.

Biochar-modified asphalt was prepared via the high-speed shear method through the following steps:

Step 1: heat the base asphalt to 150–160°C and add the prepared crop straw biochar to the melted asphalt at the desired dosage;

Step 2: insert the high-speed shearing machine into the asphalt for high-speed shearing for at least 30 min and then heat the asphalt continuously to ensure that its temperature is at least 150°C;

Step 3: place the modified asphalt in an environmental box at 120°C for 6 h to ensure that the crop straw biochar fully absorbs the asphalt.

Step 4: take out the modified asphalt and place it in a clean place until its temperature is constant.

A commercially available charcoal was utilized for comparison. Using the same method, the commercial charcoal was ground into a powder, and a 0.075 mm square-holed sieve was utilized to ensure that the powder consisted of particles with a diameter smaller than 0.075 mm.

4. Experiments

4.1 Scanning electron microscopy

Two types of carbon powder were pasted on a conductive tape, and a ZEISS SUPRA 55 field emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM) system (Zeiss ultra 55) was used to characterize the biochar and commercial charcoal powders. In addition, the element content of the two samples was determined through an element analysis using an electron diffraction spectroscopy (EDS) module.

4.2 Laser particle size analysis

The particle size distribution of carbon powder has an important influence on its dispersion characteristics in asphalt and, in turn, on the physical shear time and performance of the modified asphalt in the production process. To determine the particle size distribution of the crop straw biochar and commercial charcoal powders, we used a Malvern Mastersizer 3000 laser particle size meter. The main technical parameters of the Malvern Mastersizer 3000 laser particle size meter are presented in Table 2.

Table 2. Main technical parameters of the Malvern Mastersizer 3000.

Parameter type Parameter value
Red light source Maximum 4MW He-Ne, 632.8nm
Blue light source 10mW LED, 470nm
Effective focal length 300mm
Range 0.01–3500μm

4.3 Physical property test of the biochar and charcoal powders

The softening point, 15°C ductility, and 25°C penetration of the biochar-modified asphalt and commercial charcoal modified asphalt were measured when the biochar content was 0%, 2%, 4%, 6%, 8%, 10%, and 12% (percentage by mass of asphalt), according to the Standard Test Methods of Bitumen and Bituminous Mixtures for Highway Engineering (JTG E20-2011) of China [29]. The purpose of testing these indexes was to compare the effect of two types of carbon powder on the performance of asphalt, and to determine the optimal dosage of crop straw biochar when used for asphalt modification. In addition, to determine the mixing and compaction temperatures of the asphalt pavement with crop straw biochar, the optimum crop straw biochar was determined twice, and the apparent viscosity was measured at 120, 135, 150, 160, and 175°C according to the Standard Test Methods of Bitumen and Bituminous Mixtures for Highway Engineering (JTG E20-2011) of China [29].

5. Results and discussion

5.1 Differences between biochar and charcoal

The SEM images of the two specimens are presented in Fig 1.

Fig 1. SEM images of the two types of carbon powder samples (500× magnification).

Fig 1

As shown in Fig 1, the particle characteristics of the two types of carbon powder samples are similar, the particle shape of the powder is octahedron-like, and there is a small number of fibrous components. The mapping diagrams of the two types of test pieces are presented in Fig 2.

Fig 2. Mapping images of the two types of carbon powder samples.

Fig 2

In Fig 2, carbon, silicon, oxygen, and potassium are marked in red, blue, green, and pink, respectively. It can be seen that both types of carbon powder mainly consist of carbon and contain some silicon, oxygen, and potassium. The element distribution of biochar is more uniform than that of commercial charcoal. Table 3 presents the results of the EDS analysis.

Table 3. Content of each element in the two types of carbon powder.

Element type Atomic percentage (%) Mass percentage (%)
Commercial charcoal powder biochar powder made from straw Commercial charcoal powder biochar powder made from straw
C 80.64 83.46 72.56 75.86
O 15.96 13.55 19.13 16.4
Mg 0.43 0.17 0.78 0.32
Al 0.24 0.00 0.48 0.00
Si 1.21 1.06 2.55 2.26
K 0.88 1.14 2.57 3.36
Ca 0.64 0.43 1.93 1.29
Cl 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.51

Table 3 and Fig 2 reveal that the two types of carbon powder contain mainly C, O, Si, and K, and the C content in the crop straw biochar is slightly higher than that in commercial charcoal. The contents of the above four elements accounts for more than 96% of the mass fraction of each test piece. In addition, small amounts of Ca and Mg were found in the two powders.

We performed a single factor ANOVA in Microsoft Excel software to analyze the differences in the mass percentage of the elements in the two kinds of charcoal. At the time of analysis, the significance level was set to 0.05; the results are presented in Table 4.

Table 4. Results of single factor ANOVA.

Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
Between Groups 1.819E-12 1.000 1.818E-12 2.231E-15 1.000 4.600
Within Groups 11412.269 14.000 815.162
Total 11412.269 15.000

As shown in Table 4, the detection statistic F is significantly less than the critical value F crit, indicating that biochar and commercial charcoal have similar performance.

5.2 Particle size distribution

Because the particle size of carbon powder is very small (micron level), it is difficult to characterize it from the grading distribution diagram. Therefore, in this study, a laser particle size analysis test of the crop straw biochar and commercial charcoal was conducted. Fig 3 shows the particle volume distribution of the two types of charcoal powder.

Fig 3. Particle size distribution of the two types of carbon powder.

Fig 3

From the figure, it can be seen that the particle size range of the crop straw biochar powder is greater than that of commercial charcoal; the particle size of crop straw biochar powder is concentrated in the range of 3–30 μm, whereas that of commercial charcoal is concentrated in the range of 5–70 μm. The grain size distribution curve of biochar was left-shifted compared to that of the commercial charcoal, which indicates a finer biochar particle size. Some biochar particles have a diameter greater than 75 μm; this is inevitable given the large number of carbon particles. Nevertheless, the amount of such large particles is very small and can be neglected.

Table 5 presents the results of the particle size analysis test of the two biochar powders. In Table 5, D[3,2] denotes the area average diameter; D[4,3] denotes the volume average diameter; D(10), D(50), and D(90) indicate that particles smaller than the listed particle size account for 10%, 50%, and 90% of the total number of particles, respectively.

Table 5. Particle characteristic parameters of the two types of carbon powder.

Particle characteristic parameters biochar powder made from straw Commercial charcoal powder
Specific surface area 829.9 m²/kg 599.3 m²/kg
D [3,2] 7.23 μm 10.0 μm
D[4,3] 19.80 μm 25.10 μm
D(10) 3.53 μm 4.52 μm
D(50) 9.68 μm 20.4 0μm
D(90) 35.00 μm 53.6 0μm

Table 5 reveals that the d [3,2], d [4,3], D (10), D (50), and D (90) values of crop straw biochar are smaller than those of commercial carbon, indicating the particle size of crop straw biochar is smaller than that of commercial carbon. The commercial charcoal has a finer particle size and larger specific surface area than crop straw biochar. With equal quality, the crop straw biochar powder has a larger contact area with asphalt, so it mixes less than the commercial charcoal. Some studies have shown that smaller-sized particles (especially those smaller than 150 μm) form stronger agglomerates [30]. This is because the van der Waals force between the particles is strong when the particles are small, which induces the particles to agglomerate [31]. Owing to its smaller particle size, the crop straw biochar powder agglomerates more easily; hence, the crop straw biochar-modified asphalt requires a longer shearing time during preparation. When the powder is added into the asphalt binder, the asphalt gets wrapped on the surface of the powder particles, and interfacial tension will be induced under the combined action of the intermolecular force between the two-phase, chemical bond, and mechanical locking force. Under these effects, the plasticity of asphalt will be reduced, and deformation does not occur easily under the action of the force [32].

5.3 Technical performance of the modified asphalt

The technical performance test results of the crop straw biochar-modified asphalt are presented in Table 6.

Table 6. Technical performance of the asphalt under different biochar contents.

mass percentage of carbon powder content in asphalt binder/% 0 2 4 6 8 10 12
biochar powder made from straw Penetration (25°C, 100 g, 5 s)/0.1 mm) 75.2 62.5 56.6 52.4 51.2 49.6 47.5
Softening point/°C 45.6 47.5 48.5 50.4 51.2 52.4 53.6
Ductility at 15°C/(cm) 110.4 56.6 32.8 24.5 21.8 18.2 14.6
Commercial charcoal powder Penetration (25°C, 100 g, 5 s)/0.1 mm) 75.2 63.2 57.6 53.5 51.9 49.2 48.1
Softening point/°C 45.6 46.9 48.2 49.5 50.8 51.7 52.6
Ductility at 15°C/(cm) 110.4 57.2 33.5 25.3 22.4 20.1 16.5

It was found that, with the increase in biochar or commercial charcoal content, the asphalt penetration decreased, the softening point increased, and the ductility decreased. Many studies have shown that the softening point, penetration, and ductility of asphalt are significantly related to the high-temperature performance of asphalt [33,34]. A better high-temperature performance of asphalt leads to a higher softening point and smaller penetration and ductility. Therefore, the addition of carbon powder significantly increased the high-temperature performance of asphalt but had a negative impact on its low-temperature performance. This is because the chemical properties of carbon powder asphalt are very stable, and the addition of carbon powder changes the rheological properties of asphalt, which is then difficult to deform in the high temperature season. Table 6 reveals that the technical properties of biochar and commercial charcoal modified asphalt with different carbon powder content are similar, indicating that the high temperature performance of the two modified asphalts is also similar.

In addition, each asphalt index changes rapidly in the early stage and tends to be smooth when the asphalt content exceeds 6%. Therefore, 6% biochar is recommended to produce asphalt.

In the construction of asphalt pavement, energy is consumed for heating the asphalt and aggregates and for mixing. Increasing the heating temperature of asphalt and the mixing time of the mixture will increase the energy consumption; moreover, increasing the mixing time will also reduce the mixing rate, affect construction progress, and increase construction costs.

The construction workability of asphalt pavement has a significant relationship with the viscosity–temperature characteristics of the asphalt binder [35,36]. China’s technical code for highway asphalt pavement construction recommends the temperature corresponding to a viscosity of 0.17 ± 0.02 Pa·s as the mixing temperature of the asphalt mixture, and the temperature corresponding to a viscosity of 0.28 ± 0.03 Pa·s as the best compaction temperature of the asphalt mixture [37]. Therefore, in this study, the apparent viscosity of the asphalt binder with 6% biochar was measured at 135 and 175°C [38]. Fig 4 shows plots of the viscosity–temperature curve of the biochar-modified asphalt in a semi-logarithmic scale.

Fig 4. Viscosity–temperature curve of the biochar-modified asphalt.

Fig 4

From the figure, it can be seen that the temperature corresponding to a viscosity of 0.17 ± 0.02 and 0.28 ± 0.03 Pa·s is 161–166 and 151–156°C, respectively. Therefore, the mixing and compaction temperatures of the biochar-modified asphalt mixture are 161–166 and 152–156°C, respectively. These temperatures are slightly higher than the construction temperature of matrix asphalt No. 70.

6. Conclusions and recommendations

We confirmed that biochar can be prepared from crop straw and can be added into asphalt and found that the addition of crop straw biochar significantly improved the high-temperature performance of asphalt. Although the addition of crop straw reduces the low-temperature performance of asphalt, there is hardly any low-temperature road failure in high-temperature regions; thus, the low-temperature performance requirement of asphalt is very low. The addition of crop straw biochar was shown to increase the high-temperature performance of asphalt, which is beneficial to asphalt pavement in high-temperature regions. The crop straw biochar and commercial coal mainly consist of C, O, Si, and K, indicating that the biochar produced from crop straw has properties similar to commercial coal. Based on experimental results, we determined the appropriate amount of straw biochar powder to be used in asphalt to be 6%.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. EDS results of commercial charcoal powder.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. EDS results of biochar powder made from straw.

(TIF)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This work was financially supported by the open fund of the Research and Development Center of Transport Industry of Technologies, Materials and Equipments of Highway Construction and Maintenance (GLKF201816).

References

  • 1.Patience Afi Seglah A. Crop straw utilization and field burning in Northern region of Ghana. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020,261–275. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Guoliang CAO, Xiaoye ZHANG, Fangcheng ZHENG. Estimating the Quantity of Crop Residues Burnt in Open Field in China. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2006, 28(1):9–13. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zhang Libo, Liu Yongqiang, and Hao Lu. "Contributions of open crop straw burning emissions to PM2.5 concentrations in China." Environmental Research Letters. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Glissmann Kristin, Conrad Ralf. Fermentation pattern of methanogenic degradation of rice straw in anoxic paddy soil, FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 2000, 31, 117–126. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2000.tb00677.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Simms Reebie, Hernando D., and Roque R.. "A new paradigm to explain the development of instability rutting in asphalt pavements." Road Materials & Pavement Design (2019):1–14. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Alae Mohsen. "Effects of layer interface conditions on top-down fatigue cracking of asphalt pavements." International Journal of Pavement Engineering (2018):1–9. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Al-Qudsi Ahmad, Cannone Falchetto Augusto, Wang Di, Büchler Stephan, Kim Yun Su, Wistuba Michael P.. Finite element cohesive fracture modeling of asphalt mixture based on the semi-circular bending (SCB) test and self-affine fractal cracks at low temperatures. Cold Regions Science and Technology,2020,169. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rad Farhad Yousefi. "Investigation of proper long-term laboratory aging temperature for performance testing of asphalt concrete." Construction and Building Materials 147.aug.30(2017):616–629. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhao Sheng, Huang Baoshan, Shu Xiang, Ye Philip. Laboratory Investigation of biochar-Modified Asphalt Mixture. Transportation Research Record,2014,2445(1). [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Notani Mohammad Ali, Arabzadeh Ali, Satvati Sajjad, Tabesh Mahmood Tarighati, Hashjin Navid Ghafari, Estakhri Shahriar, et al. Investigating the high-temperature performance and activation energy of carbon black-modified asphalt binder. SN Applied Sciences,2020,2(3). [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wang Jiangjun. Research on modification of road asphalt with coniferous charcoal. Foreign Highway, 2001, 2001(03):52–55 [in Chinese]. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Doyle C J, Mason V C, Baker R D. Straw disposal and utilization: an economic evaluation of the alternative end-uses for wheat straw in the UK. Biological Wastes, 1988, 23(1):39–56. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Smuga-Kogut Małgorzata. "Use of Buckwheat Straw to Produce Ethyl Alcohol Using Ionic Liquids." Energies12.10(2019):2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Shafie S.M., Mahlia T.M.I., and Masjuki H.H. "Life cycle assessment of rice straw co-firing with coal power generation in Malaysia." Energy 57(2013):284–294. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sun Mingxing, Xu Xiangbo, Wang Chengdong, Bai Yunli, Fu Chao, Zhang Linxiu, et al. Environmental burdens of the comprehensive utilization of straw: Wheat straw utilization from a life-cycle perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production,2020,259. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Nair RB, Kabir MM, Lennartsson PR. Integrated Process for Ethanol, Biogas, and Edible Filamentous Fungi-Based Animal Feed Production from Dilute Phosphoric Acid-Pretreated Wheat Straw. applied biochemistry & biotechnology, 2018, 184(1):48–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mohanty Pravakar. "Evaluation of the physiochemical development of biochars obtained from pyrolysis of wheat straw, timothy grass and pinewood: Effects of heating rate." Journal of Analytical & Applied Pyrolysis 104.nov.(2013):485–493. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yakout, and Sobhy M. "Physicochemical Characteristics of biochar Produced from Rice Straw at Different Pyrolysis Temperature for Soil Amendment and Removal of Organics." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences India 87.2(2017):207–214. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mehmood. "Influence of nitrogen fertilizer forms and crop straw biochars on soil exchange properties and maize growth on an acidic Ultisol." Archives of Agronomy & Soil Science.
  • 20.Hansen Veronika. "The effects of straw or straw-derived gasification biochar applications on soil quality and crop productivity: A farm case study." Journal of Environmental Management 186. pt. 1(2017):88–95. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.10.041 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Guo Junyuan, Gao Qifan, Jiang Shilin. Insight into dewatering behavior and heavy metals transformation during waste activated sludge treatment by thermally-activated sodium persulfate oxidation combined with a skeleton builder—wheat straw biochar. Chemosphere,2020,252. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126542 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wang Ting, Li Yuening, Zhi Dengke, Lin Yingchao, He Kai, Liu Boyang, et al. Assessment of combustion and emission behavior of corn straw biochar briquette fuels under different temperatures. Journal of Environmental Management,2019,250–258. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109399 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Shengl Zhao. "Utilizing biochar as a bio-modifier for asphalt cement: A sustainable application of bio-fuel by-product." Fuel 133.oct.1(2014):52–62. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Walters Renaldo. "Investigating biochar as Flow Modifier and Water Treatment Agent for Sustainable Pavement Design." American Journal of Engineering & Applied Sciences 8.1(2015):138–146. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Fu Zhen, Lin Menglei, Jia Jiasheng. Road properties of biochar modified asphalt. Journal of Guangxi University(Nat Sci Ed), 2017, 42(04):1496–1504 [in Chinese]. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zhang Ran, Dai Qingli, You Zhanping, Wang Hainian, Peng Chao. Rheological Performance of biochar Modified Asphalt with Different Particle Sizes. Applied Sciences,2018,8(9). [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wu Yushuai. Modeling of the Complex Modulus of Asphalt Mastic with Biochar Filler Based on the Homogenization and Random Aggregate Distribution Methods. Advances in Materials ence and Engineering 2020.2(2020):1–12. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kumar Abhinay. Evaluation of bio-asphalt binders modified with biochar: a pyrolysis by-product of Mesua ferrea seed cover waste. Cogent Engineering 5.1(2018):1–15. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.RIOH. Standard test methods of bitumen and bituminous mixtures for highway engineering (JTJ E20-2011). Beijing: China Communications Press;2011. [in Chinese]. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Maskara Alok, Smith Douglas M.. Agglomeration during the Drying of Fine Silica Powders, Part II: The Role of Particle Solubility. Journal of the American Ceramic Society,1997,80(7). [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Stienvuthchan Sumanas. Wet granulation: Effect of surface tension, polymer concentration and particle morphology on particle agglomeration and granule strength. Purdue University.1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ghorab M K, Marrs K, Taylor L S. Water–solid interactions between amorphous maltodextrins and crystalline sodium chloride. Food Chemistry, 2014, 144(feb.1):26–35. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.02.123 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Gang Peng. Study on High and Low Temperature Properties of SBS Modified Asphalt with fasir. International Conference on Mechanical Materials & Manufacturing Engineering 2016.
  • 34.Ali, Shaban Ismael Albrka. High Temperatures Performance Investigation of Geopolymer Modified Bitumen Binders. Tenth International Conference on the Bearing Capacity of Roads, Railways and Airfields, BCRRA 2017.
  • 35.Cao Zhilong, Chen Meizhu, Han Xiaobin. Evaluation of viscosity-temperature characteristics and rheological properties of rejuvenated SBS modified bitumen with active warm additive. Construction and Building Materials 2020;36:1–11. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zhang Jiupeng, Yang Fenghua, Pei Jianzhong, Xu Shicui, An Fengwei. Viscosity-temperature characteristics of warm mix asphalt binder with Sasobit®. Construction and Building Materials,2015,78. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.RIOH. Technical Specification for Construction of Highway Asphalt Pavements (JTG F40-2004). Beijing: China Communications Press;2004. [in Chinese]. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.RIOH. Standard test methods of bitumen and bituminous mixtures for highway engineering (JTG 052–2000). Beijing: China Communications Press;2011. [in Chinese]. [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Andrew R Zimmerman

4 Sep 2020

PONE-D-20-24402

Application of biochar prepared from crop straw in asphalt modification

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Gan,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Oct 19 2020 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Andrew R. Zimmerman, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

Please pay special attention to the comments of Reviewer #1 who notes that much more discussion of the results is warranted and whole paper needs a thorough editing for proper grammar and English usage by a native English writer.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Partly

Reviewer #3: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: N/A

Reviewer #3: No

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Please see attached MS Word document. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reviewer #2: The study investigates the properties of asphalt binder modified with different dosages of biochar derived from crop straw. Some comments on the manuscript are as follows:

• The abstract states that “viscosity of the asphalt binder modified using different dosages of biochar powder were measured”. However, the viscosity results are presented for the binder with 6% biochar only. Please make suitable corrections to the abstract.

• No results of technical performance (penetration, softening point, ductility, viscosity) are presented for commercial charcoal modified asphalt binders. Please provide an objective statement, preferably in Section 1 of the manuscript.

• The authors have reviewed literature on the use of biochar for asphalt binder modification. I suggest the authors to also include the following relevant articles for an updated state-of-the-art on the subject:

(1) Wu, Y., Cao, P., Shi, F., Liu, K., Wang, X., Leng, Z., ... & Zhou, C. (2020). Modeling of the Complex Modulus of Asphalt Mastic with Biochar Filler Based on the Homogenization and Random Aggregate Distribution Methods. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2020.

(2) Kumar, A., Choudhary, R., Narzari, R., Kataki, R., & Shukla, S. K. (2018). Evaluation of bio-asphalt binders modified with biochar: a pyrolysis by-product of Mesua ferrea seed cover waste. Cogent Engineering, 5(1), 1548534.

• Was an oxygen-deficit environment upheld during the generation of biochar? If yes, then it should be reported that the biochar was prepared under pyrolytic conditions.

• Did the authors observe any foaming of the asphalt binder on addition of biochar at the mixing temperatures?

• Placement under 120 °C for 6 hours will likely lead to an accelerated aging of the modified blend. Can authors justify this step? Were any arrangements made to ensure that the control binder also underwent a similar degree of aging before being subjected to testing?

• Authors are encouraged to discuss the implications of SEM and EDS results. How can the morphological features of biochar affect the asphalt-biochar interaction?

• Section 5.2: It is reported that “…biochar powder is more likely to agglomerate because of interfacial tension”. Since the interfacial tension was not measured in the study, please support this statement with appropriate reference(s).

• It is reported that biochar particles passing the 75-micron sieve were used in the study. However, Figure 5 shows some amount of biochar particles near the 1000-micron size. An explanation is needed for this observation. Could it be due to possible contamination by larger particles during the analysis?

• At several instances, the authors have emphasized that C content in biochar was found higher than charcoal. Please indicate what does it mean in physical terms: does it have a bearing on the asphalt-biochar blend properties?

• Some minor comments are:

o Replace ‘density’ with ‘ductility’ in Table 5 and also correct the units.

o Replace ‘brockfield’ with ‘Brookfield’ in Section 4.3.

o Replace ‘aggregation’ with ‘aggregates’ in Section 5.3.

Reviewer #3: The authors used a agriculture waste by product for enhancing the asphalt mixture properties. Although, they claimed that the main advantage of disposing of such waste material into environmental would cause environmental concern, still burning process (400 C) is used to produce bio-char material from it.

Since the authors did not include line number, I refer the comments through paragraph number.

1- Is not there any anther usage from strew waste materials? Recycling or in animal food science? It seems that the authors claimed that the only option, except land-filling, is to use it as asphalt material reinforcement agent! Please double check and verify your claim.

2- In figure 1, as far as I know, such straw is good for sheep grazing.

3- In table 1, specify the viscosity measurement temperature.

4- What is the advantage of providing elements of biochar straw? Once the authors have taken molecular dynamic simulation or investigate the physiochemical interaction between asphalt binders and modifier, providing such information would be beneficial.

5- The dosage shown in Table 5, is based on the total weight of binder? If so, please alluded it.

6- Based on old fashion test result, it is hard to believe that such agent would be beneficial for asphalt industry. To understand better, if you add any solid garbage in the asphalt binder, the same trend would be perceived! The advanced rheological test result would help to distinguish the different and make it advantageous be cleared.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: PLOS_ONE.docx

PLoS One. 2021 Feb 25;16(2):e0247390. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247390.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


30 Nov 2020

We thank you and the reviewers for your thoughtful suggestions and insights. The manuscript has benefited from these insightful suggestions. I look forward to working with you and the reviewers to move this manuscript closer to publication in the PLOS ONE.

The manuscript has been rechecked and the necessary changes have been made in accordance with the reviewers’ suggestions.

We revised the corresponding questions in Introduction, Lit Review, Materials and Methods, Results and Discussion in accordance with the reviewers’ comments, and rewritten the Conclusions.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.doc

Decision Letter 1

Andrew R Zimmerman

2 Dec 2020

PONE-D-20-24402R1

Application of biochar prepared from crop straw in asphalt modification

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Gan,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================

ACADEMIC EDITOR:

In your first revision, I only see responses to the first reviewer and not the second or third reviewer. Also, I did not see indication of the changes made in your 'track changes' revised manuscript submitted. Please be sure do have all this done before submitting again. Thanks

==============================

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jan 16 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Andrew R. Zimmerman

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

Dear Dr. Gan,

In your first revision, I only see responses to the first reviewer and not the second or third reviewer. Also, I did not see indication of the changes made in your 'track changes' revised manuscript submitted. Please be sure do have all this done before submitting again. Thanks

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Feb 25;16(2):e0247390. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247390.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


15 Dec 2020

We appreciated your letter regarding our manuscript (PONE-D-20-24402) titled “Application of Bio-char from Crop Straw in Asphalt Modification.” We are also extremely grateful to the reviewers for their comments on our manuscript. We carefully considered every comment and made thorough revision accordingly. In We have also addressed all their comments and answered all their questions in detail. If you have any other questions about this paper, I would appreciated it if you could let me know as soon as possible, so I can answered them.

Additive list

To reviewer #1:

Introduction :

Comment 1: First paragraph, 3rd line from bottom – I do not think “rational” is the word you want there. Suggest replacing with “sustainable.”

Answer: Thanks for your very thoughtful suggestion. The manuscript has been thoroughly checked, and the mistakes have been fixed with the help of a native speaker. We have revised this sentence as follows: “Therefore, a sensible and sustainable way of using crop straw has become an important research and real-world application issue.”

Comment 2: First paragraph, sentence starting with “One possible method….” This is a sentence fragment/improper tenses/punctuation. It needs to be rewritten.

Answer: Thanks for your very thoughtful suggestion. We have revised this sentence as follows: “Therefore, a sensible and sustainable way of using crop straw has become an important research and real-world application issue.”

Comment 3: Second paragraph, first sentence – remove the words “owing to repeated usage.” They are unnecessary, and the sentence should just start with “The performance of asphalt pavements….”

Answer: Thanks for your very thoughtful suggestion. We have revised this sentence as follows: “The performance of asphalt pavements inevitably declines under the combined action of load and the natural environment.”

Comment 4: Second paragraph, sentence that starts with “Under” – the word “owing” is used incorrectly. You mean “because of”

Answer: Thanks for your very thoughtful suggestion. We have revised this sentence as follows: “The performance of asphalt pavements inevitably declines under the combined action of load and the natural environment.”

Comment 5: Next sentence, remove “Being a cementitious material”

Answer: Thanks for your very thoughtful suggestion. We have revised this sentence as follows: “Asphalt, as a cementitious material, ages under the influence of light and temperature, which reduce its cementation ability and negatively affect the durability of asphalt pavement [7].”

Comment 6: Sentence after that, remove the words “Therefore, owing” and replace with “Because of”

Answer: Thanks for your very thoughtful suggestion. We have revised this sentence as follows: “Owing to its high cost and environmental sensitivity, improving the durability of asphalt pavement has become the focus of road engineers.”

Comment 7: Third paragraph – extra “the” before adding.

Answer: Thanks for your very thoughtful suggestion. We have added "the" before "adding"

Comment 8: Third paragraph, third line – remove the comma after mixtures.

Answer: Thanks for your very thoughtful suggestion. We have removed the comma after “mixtures”, and revised this sentence as follows: “and aging resistance of asphalt and asphalt mixtures and does not adversely affect other asphalt pavement performance indicators [8, 9].”

Lit Review :

Comment 1: 4th line – remove the word “purposes” after “energy generation;” remove the dashes around the “such as” clause and replace with commas.

Answer: Thanks for your very thoughtful suggestion. We have revised this sentence as follows: “studied the economic benefit of the use of straw as a fuel, as raw material for papermaking, and as animal feed, compared to burning the straw in a field. Smuga-Kogut et al.”

Comment 2: Sentence that starts with S.M. Shafie – remove the comma after “logistical costs.”

Answer: Thanks for your very thoughtful suggestion. We have removed the comma after“logistical costs.”

Comment 3: Same sentence and next sentence – inconsistent formatting with your references. Above you were referring to your references by last name only. Then you did initials and last name. And here it is full first name and last name (Mingxing Sun). And then in the next sentence you are back to last name only (Nair). Which is correct? Be consistent and stick to it!

Answer: Thanks for your very thoughtful suggestion. We have revised the format of the references.

Comment 4: Next paragraph – same inconsistencies noted above (Zhao Sheng or just “Sheng” would probably be more correct); Renaldo Walters vs.”Walters.” Etc.

Answer: Thanks for your very thoughtful suggestion. We have revised the format of the references.

Comment 5: Sentence that starts with “Renaldo Walters” – you wrote 3 and 6%. The correct punctuation is “3% and 6%.”

Answer: Thanks for your very thoughtful suggestion. We have added "%" after "3"

Comment 6: Sentence starting with “FU Zhen” – this sentence does not make any sense unless you add the word “at” before the word “were.” (i.e. …asphalt that were conducted at….”

Answer: Thanks for your very thoughtful suggestion. We have revised this sentence as follows: “ Zhen et al. [24] prepared bio-char-modified asphalt via the high-speed shear method and conducted laboratory rolling thin film oven test and 60 °C dynamic viscosity tests of the bio-char-modified asphalt; they found that bio-char could strengthen the bond capability and resistance to flow deformation of the modified asphalt.”

Materials and Methods :

Comment 1: Sentence right after Fig. 2 – this should be in the past tense. I.e., the preparation process was as follows.

Answer: Thanks for your very thoughtful suggestion. We have revised this sentence as follows: ”The preparation process was as follows”

Comment 2: Step 4 – the subject of this sentence is “the straws.” Therefore, the correct pronoun to refer to this subject is “they” and not “it.”

Answer: Thanks for your very thoughtful suggestion. We have revised this sentence as follows: ” After cooling, the bio-char was ground to a powder using a grinder.”

Comment 3: Section 4.3 – What are the details associated with your physical property testing? Were there repetitions? If so, how many? Was a standard followed? If so, it must be referenced.

Answer: Thanks for your very thoughtful suggestion. These tests followed the Standard Test Methods of Bitumen and Bituminous Mixtures for Highway Engineering (JTG E20-2011) of China. This has been specified in the manuscript. Following these standards, the ductility, softening point, and penetration tests were repeated three, two, and three times in each group, respectively.

Results and Discussion :

Comment 1: Figs. 3 & 4 – I can see from the figure that the authors did not bother to make a “clean” document for submission and instead left the track changes on in MS Word. This is sloppy/one should expect better than this if this paper is truly ready for publication.

Answer: Thanks for your very thoughtful suggestion. We are sorry for these problems. We have carefully proofread the manuscript and fixed all formatting issues.

Comment 2: Section 5.2 – third paragraph through the end of this section – I can clearly see the point the authors are making – bio-char has much smaller particles statistically than commercial-grade charcoal. However, I find myself wondering if this is the best way to present these data. Would it not be more efficient/concise to express Table 4 in graphical form similar to an aggregate particle distribution chart or a geotechnical soil particle chart? I would think this would make the data a little bit easier to read/interpret. In either case, remove the word “owing” in the 3rd to last line from the bottom of this section. Almost always, you can strike “owing” from your writing and either remove it entirely or replace it with the word “because.”

Answer: Thanks for your very thoughtful suggestion. Because the particle size of carbon powder is very small (micron size), it is difficult to characterize it by the grading distribution diagram. Therefore, in this study, a laser particle size analysis test of the crop straw bio-char and commercial charcoal was conducted to evaluate the particle size characteristics of carbon powder. As suggested, we replaced the word “owing” with the word “because.”

Comment 3: Section 5.3 – remove the word “moreover” from the sentence that starts with “As the biochar content increased…” Also add semicolon before “and the ductility”

Answer: Thanks for your very thoughtful suggestion. We have revised this sentence as follows: “It was found that, with the increase in bio-char content, the asphalt penetration decreased, the softening point increased, and the ductility decreased.”

Comment 4: Same sentence in Section 5.3 – you said that bio-char “significantly increased high-temperature performance.” Be careful with the word significantly unless you really mean it. It does not appear that there was any testing repetition, although based upon Section 4.3, it is very difficult to tell exactly what the authors did. If there were no repetitions, it would be very difficult to prove statistical significance. If the authors would be willing to couch their argument to something less definitive (i.e., remove the word “significant”) this would be fine as well. In either case, I would think a graphical presentation might be a better way to present these data as opposed to putting them in tabular form. Doing so would allow you to do much more interesting analysis like (for example) plotting a regression line through the data points. This does not prove statistical significance, but it does show a relationship between % biochar and physical properties and would be much more sophisticated than what is presented here. I just plotted the data myself and noted that there appears to be a linear relationship between softening and % bio-char; and apparent exponential relationships between penetration & density and % bio-char. Each of these relationships had relatively high R-squared values.

Answer: Thanks for your very thoughtful suggestion.

Many studies have shown that the softening point, penetration and ductility of asphalt are significantly related to the high temperature performance of asphalt. The better the high temperature performance of asphalt, the higher the softening point, the smaller penetration and ductility. The standard of these tests followed is the Standard Test Methods of Bitumen and Bituminous Mixtures for Highway Engineering (JTG E20-2011) of China. Each test was repeated in accordance with the requirements of the standard.

Conclusions :

Comment 1: The authors have dutifully summarized there work here. However, they have done almost nothing to connect the dots for the reader. In other words, what do these results imply for future asphalt mixtures? Might they be applicable to other types of asphalt with different aggregate?

Answer: Thanks for your very thoughtful suggestion. We rewrote the conclusions as follows: “Bio-char can be prepared from crop straw and can be added it into asphalt, especially in high-temperature areas. Although the biological addition of crop straw reduces the low-temperature performance of asphalt, there is hardly any low-temperature road failure in high-temperature regions; thus, the low-temperature performance requirement of asphalt is very low. The addition of crop straw bio-char increases the high-temperature performance of asphalt, which is beneficial to asphalt pavement in high-temperature regions. In addition, some studies have shown that the addition of commercial charcoal in the form of carbon powder can improve the high-temperature performance and fatigue performance of asphalt. The elements in both the crop straw bio-char and the commercial coal are mainly C, O, Si, and K. This indicates that the bio-char from crop straw has properties similar to the commercial coal. Based on experimental results, we determined the appropriate amount of straw bio-char powder to be used in asphalt to be 6 %, so the construction temperature should be increased appropriately.”

To reviewer #2:

Comment 1: The abstract states that “viscosity of the asphalt binder modified using different dosages of biochar powder were measured”. However, the viscosity results are presented for the binder with 6% biochar only. Please make suitable corrections to the abstract.

Answer: Thanks for your very thoughtful suggestion. We have revised this sentence in the abstract as follows: ”and the apparent viscosity of the asphalt binder with 6% bio-char was measured at 135 and 175 °C.”

Comment 2: No results of technical performance (penetration, softening point, ductility, viscosity) are presented for commercial charcoal modified asphalt binders. Please provide an objective statement, preferably in Section 1 of the manuscript.

Answer: Thanks for your very thoughtful suggestion. Previous studies on charcoal-modified asphalt used charcoal prepared from wood in the laboratory or commercial charcoal. We have specified this in Section 1.

Comment 3: The authors have reviewed literature on the use of biochar for asphalt binder modification. I suggest the authors to also include the following relevant articles for an updated state-of-the-art on the subject:

(1) Wu, Y., Cao, P., Shi, F., Liu, K., Wang, X., Leng, Z., ... & Zhou, C. (2020). Modeling of the Complex Modulus of Asphalt Mastic with Biochar Filler Based on the Homogenization and Random Aggregate Distribution Methods. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2020.

(2) Kumar, A., Choudhary, R., Narzari, R., Kataki, R., & Shukla, S. K. (2018). Evaluation of bio-asphalt binders modified with biochar: a pyrolysis by-product of Mesua ferrea seed cover waste. Cogent Engineering, 5(1), 1548534.

Answer: Thanks for your very thoughtful suggestion. We have carefully read these two articles and cited them in our paper.

Comment 4: Was an oxygen-deficit environment upheld during the generation of biochar? If yes, then it should be reported that the biochar was prepared under pyrolytic conditions.

Answer: Thanks for your very thoughtful suggestion. Indeed, the biochar was prepared under pyrolytic conditions. The muffle furnaces was sealed to maintain an oxygen-deficit environment. We have specified this in the section "3. Materials".

Comment 5: Did the authors observe any foaming of the asphalt binder on addition of biochar at the mixing temperatures?

Answer: Thanks for your very thoughtful suggestion. Yes, after the carbon powder is mixed into the asphalt, the air present in the pores of the biochar powder will enter the asphalt, causing the asphalt to produce some foam.

Comment 6: Placement under 120 °C for 6 hours will likely lead to an accelerated aging of the modified blend. Can authors justify this step? Were any arrangements made to ensure that the control binder also underwent a similar degree of aging before being subjected to testing?

Answer: Thanks for your very thoughtful suggestion. At higher temperature, the aging of asphalt is inevitable. In fact, any modification of the asphalt will inevitably lead to asphalt aging to a certain extent. Even asphalt stored in asphalt tanks above 120 ℃ (which is common before construction) ages. At present, there is no better way to prevent asphalt from aging.

Comment 7: Authors are encouraged to discuss the implications of SEM and EDS results. How can the morphological features of biochar affect the asphalt-biochar interaction?

Answer: Thanks for your very thoughtful suggestion. We have discussed some analysis results in the manuscript. When the powder is added into the asphalt binder, the asphalt will be wrapped on the surface of the powder particles, and interfacial tension will form under the combined action of intermolecular force between the two-phase, chemical bond, and mechanical locking forces.. Under the action of the interfacial tension, the asphalt will bond, thus reducing the plasticity of the asphalt. Finer carbon particles lead to larger surface area and stronger adsorption of asphalt.

Comment 8: Section 5.2: It is reported that “…biochar powder is more likely to agglomerate because of interfacial tension”. Since the interfacial tension was not measured in the study, please support this statement with appropriate reference(s).

Answer: Thanks for your very thoughtful suggestion. The expression of this sentence is indeed inaccurate and has been revised as follows: “Some studies have shown that smaller-sized particles (especially those smaller than 150 µm) form stronger agglomerates [29]. This is because the van der Waals force between the particles is strong when the particles are small, which induces the particles to agglomerate [30]. Because of its smaller particle size, the crop straw bio-char powder is more likely to agglomerate; hence, the crop straw bio-char-modified asphalt requires a longer shearing time during preparation. When the powder is added into the asphalt binder, the asphalt will be wrapped on the surface of the powder particles, and the interfacial tension will be induced under the combined action of the intermolecular force between the two-phase, chemical bond, and mechanical locking force. Under these effects, the plasticity of asphalt will be reduced, and deformation does not occur easily under the action of the force [31].”

Comment 9: It is reported that biochar particles passing the 75-micron sieve were used in the study. However, Figure 5 shows some amount of biochar particles near the 1000-micron size. An explanation is needed for this observation. Could it be due to possible contamination by larger particles during the analysis?

Answer: Thanks for your very thoughtful suggestion. Biochar particles passing the 75-micron sieve were used in the study. However, owing to the large number of carbon powder particles, it is inevitable that some particles greater than 75 microns will be mixed into the asphalt.

Comment 10: At several instances, the authors have emphasized that C content in biochar was found higher than charcoal. Please indicate what does it mean in physical terms: does it have a bearing on the asphalt-biochar blend properties?

Answer: Thanks for your very thoughtful suggestion. Carbon is stable in asphalt. The results show that the carbon content of bio-char is higher than that of charcoal, which indicates that the application of bio-char in asphalt modification is feasible. A higher carbon content will not adversely affect the performance of asphalt.

Comment 11: Some minor comments are:

o Replace ‘density’ with ‘ductility’ in Table 5 and also correct the units.

o Replace ‘brockfield’ with ‘Brookfield’ in Section 4.3.

o Replace ‘aggregation’ with ‘aggregates’ in Section 5.3.

Answer: Thanks for your very thoughtful suggestion. We have corrected these errors in the revised manuscript.

To reviewer #3:

Comment 1: Is not there any anther usage from strew waste materials? Recycling or in animal food science? It seems that the authors claimed that the only option, except land-filling, is to use it as asphalt material reinforcement agent! Please double check and verify your claim.

Answer: Thanks for your very thoughtful suggestion. At present, there are many ways to use crop straw apart from asphalt modification. We mentioned other methods to use crop straw in the introduction.

Comment 2: In figure 1, as far as I know, such straw is good for sheep grazing.

Answer: Thanks for your very thoughtful suggestion. China is a large agricultural country, so large quantities of straw are produced in the cultivation of crops. If sheep grazing is adopted, the treatment of these straws will be very slow. Moreover, many types of straws, such as corn straw, cannot be consumed by sheep. In addition, there are not enough sheep to consume all straw produced in crops.

Comment 3: In table 1, specify the viscosity measurement temperature.

Answer: Thanks for your very thoughtful suggestion. The viscosity was measured at 135 ℃; this has been specified in Table 1.

Comment 4: What is the advantage of providing elements of biochar straw? Once the authors have taken molecular dynamic simulation or investigate the physiochemical interaction between asphalt binders and modifier, providing such information would be beneficial.

Answer: Thanks for your very thoughtful suggestion. The elements in the crop straw bio-char are mainly C, O, Si, and K, which is consistent with the chemical composition of commercial charcoal. This indicates that the bio-char from crop straw has a similar effect to commercial charcoal.

Comment 5: The dosage shown in Table 5, is based on the total weight of binder? If so, please alluded it.

Answer: Thanks for your very thoughtful suggestion. The dosage shown in Table 5 refers to the percentage by mass of asphalt binder. This has been specified in the manuscript.

Comment 6: Based on old fashion test result, it is hard to believe that such agent would be beneficial for asphalt industry. To understand better, if you add any solid garbage in the asphalt binder, the same trend would be perceived! The advanced rheological test result would help to distinguish the different and make it advantageous be cleared.

Answer: Thanks for your very thoughtful suggestion. This article aims to provide an application method for crop straw. Given the large amount of asphalt used for pavement paving, adding crop straws in the form of biochar into asphalt can consume a large amount of straws. Bio-char can be prepared from crop straw and can be added it into asphalt, especially in high-temperature areas. Although the biological addition of crop straw reduces the low-temperature performance of asphalt, there is hardly any low-temperature road failure in high-temperature regions; thus, the low-temperature performance requirement of asphalt is very low. The addition of crop straw bio-char increases the high-temperature performance of asphalt, which is beneficial to asphalt pavement in high-temperature regions.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response_to_reviewers.doc

Decision Letter 2

Andrew R Zimmerman

18 Dec 2020

PONE-D-20-24402R2

Application of Bio-char from Crop Straw in Asphalt Modification

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Gan,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but still does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Feb 01 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Andrew R. Zimmerman, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments:

I did not find that you fully addressed all the reviewers comments and I had a look myself and foufd further improvements needed as well. Track changes can be used when further editing the revised version.

-For this and ALL future submissions, line numbers need to be added to the manuscript and changes made need to be specific by line number

-Abstract needs to do a better job reporting novel results: specifically, HOW did addition of

crop straw bio-char significantly improve the high-temperature performance? How did performance compare with commercial charcoal?

- Change all ‘bio-char’ to ‘biochar’

-Could use more editing from native speaker. It is hard to believe that this was done given the awkwardness of language throughout the text. For example, tense use must made be consistent throughout manuscript

-For goodness sake, please stop answering every reviewer comment with: “ Thanks for your very thoughtful suggestion”

-‘ et al.’ cannot be used in the author lists in the bibliography

-Comments made by reviewers, should not only be responded to in the text (not just in comments back to reviewers). For example, when a review asked “Figure 5 shows some amount of biochar particles near the 1000-micron size.”, response/explanation should be made in the manuscript

-statistical significance needs to be considered in the text. For example, it the C content of the biochar significantly different from that of charcoal? Are you presenting averages? Need std. dev. This is true of ALL your parameters examined. Also, correct significant figures need to be correct and consistent

-Your first paragraph needs improvement. Incineration is NOT a straw production method. Also, incineration is certainly not the most common use of straw. How much straw is actually incinerated?

Related to this, I and reviewer 3 think you are mistakenly representing straw as something that needs to be gotten rid of. Is this the case? We doubt it. Please address in the conclusion, whether, given the minor benefits, this is really the best use of straw. Perhaps other asphalt additives that are truly waste would be better put to use here.

-Delete figure 1 and 2. Everyone knows what straw and charcoal looks like.

- Figures need to be numbered and ordered consecutively

-Fig. 6 has only two data points. This cannot make a correlation. It should be deleted along with all mention of a linear relationship

-Caption on figure 4 insufficiently describes the image

-ALL your asphalt data tables (tabs. 1 and 5), need to compare need to compare the properties of asphalt, with that of asphalt with biochar and asphalt with commercial charcoal. Otherwise, there is little value in this research and I will have to reject the manuscript.

Reviewer #3 Comment 4: What is the advantage of providing elements of biochar straw? Once the authors have taken molecular dynamic simulation or investigate the physiochemical interaction between asphalt binders and modifier, providing such information would be beneficial.

Answer: Thanks for your very thoughtful suggestion. The elements in the crop straw bio-char are mainly C, O, Si, and K, which is consistent with the chemical composition of commercial charcoal. This indicates that the bio-char from crop straw has a similar effect to commercial charcoal.

Editor: I don’t find this answer sufficient. Elemental composition is not an advantage. The abstract states: “bio-char significantly improved the high-temperature PERFORMANCE of asphalt”. This need to be more clear in abstract and conclusion.

- The dosage shown in Table 5 refers to the percentage by mass of asphalt binder. – should be added to the Table

-The ‘binder’ needs to be specified in the manuscript.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Feb 25;16(2):e0247390. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247390.r006

Author response to Decision Letter 2


29 Jan 2021

I wish to re-submit the manuscript titled “Application of biochar from Crop Straw in Asphalt Modification” for publication in PLOS ONE. The manuscript ID is PONE-D-20-24402R2.

I thank you and the reviewers for your thoughtful suggestions and insights. The manuscript has benefited from these insightful suggestions. I look forward to working with you and the reviewers to move this manuscript closer to publication in PLOS ONE.

The manuscript has been rechecked and the necessary changes have been made in accordance with the reviewers’ suggestions. The responses to all comments have been prepared given in “Response to reviwers”.

Thank you for your consideration. I look forward to hearing from you.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response_to_reviewers.doc

Decision Letter 3

Andrew R Zimmerman

8 Feb 2021

Application of biochar from Crop Straw in Asphalt Modification

PONE-D-20-24402R3

Dear Dr. Gan,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Andrew R. Zimmerman, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Andrew R Zimmerman

15 Feb 2021

PONE-D-20-24402R3

Application of biochar from Crop Straw in Asphalt Modification

Dear Dr. Gan:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Andrew R. Zimmerman

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. EDS results of commercial charcoal powder.

    (TIF)

    S2 Fig. EDS results of biochar powder made from straw.

    (TIF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PLOS_ONE.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.doc

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response_to_reviewers.doc

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response_to_reviewers.doc

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES