Table 2.
Chief Followers Use of Shared Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data
| Disagree (n/%) | Neutral (n/%) | Agree (n/%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Celebrates: “When seeing my numbers, my CF celebrates with me when things are going well”a | 45 (14.9) | 84 (27.8) | 173 (57.3) |
| Lack of Understanding: “My CF does not understand how best to respond when seeing my numbers”a | 208 (68.9) | 50 (16.5) | 44 (14.6) |
| Offers Encouragement”: My CF offers the encouragement needed when I am struggling with my numbers”a | 27 (8.9) | 64 (21.2) | 211 (69.9) |
| Hypoglycemic Knowledge”: “My CF knows just what to do if he/she sees that my BG is getting too low”a | 13 (4.3) | 10 (3.3) | 279 (92.4) |
| Bugs Me: “Because of data sharing, my CF now bugs me too much about numbers”a | 209 (69.2) | 40 (13.2) | 53 (17.6) |
| Clear Discussion: “We had had a clear discussion about how my CF should best respond (or not) when seeing that my numbers are out of range”a | 38 (12.6) | 54 (17.9) | 210 (69.5) |
Data reflect T1D respondent's perception of CF's use of shared RT-CGM data.
a
Items were rated on a 5-point Likert response scale: 5 = “strongly agree,” 4 = “somewhat agree,” 3 = “neutral,” 2 = “somewhat disagree,” 1 = “strongly disagree.” Categories 5 and 4 (“agree”), and 2 and 1 (“disagree”) were collapsed for presentation.
BG, blood glucose; RT-CGM, real-time continuous glucose monitoring.