Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 24;45(3):565–576. doi: 10.1038/s41366-020-00716-y

Fig. 2. Lipidomics analysis of lipoma vs. matched SAT.

Fig. 2

A Relative intensity of TAGs in lipoma and SAT. The relative intensities in percent were generated from ESI-IT MS data (n = 10); the bars extend from minimum to maximum and the horizontal line depicts the mean. B–D GC-FID determination of the relative fatty acid composition of SAT and matched lipoma extracts (n = 10). For the most abundant B saturated fatty acids (SFA), C monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA), D polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) the tissue type could not explain the difference among samples (two-way ANOVA; p-value = 0.35; p-value = 0.55; p-value = 0.41, respectively).