Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 25;11:4584. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-83862-1

Table 2.

Prevalence of tfs3 ICE T4SS genes in DU, NCGC, and CG.

DU (%), n = 46 NCGC (%), n = 51 CG (%), n = 39 Total (%), n = 136
virB2 15 (32.6) 11 (21.5) 10 (25.6) 36 (26.4)
virB3 15 (32.6) 11 (21.5) 10 (25.6) 36 (26.4)
virB4 15 (32.6) 11 (21.5) 10 (25.6) 36 (26.4)
virB6 18 (39.1) 14 (27.4) 13 (33.3) 45 (33.0)
virB7 16 (34.7) 9 (17.6) 7 (17.9) 32 (23.5)
virB8 15 (32.6) 9 (17.6) 7 (17.9) 31 (22.8)
virB9 17 (36.9) 10 (19.6) 7 (17.9) 34 (25.0)
virB10 17 (36.9) 10 (19.6) 7 (17.9) 34 (25.0)
virB11 16 (34.8) 11 (21.5) 7 (17.9) 34 (25.0)
virD4 16 (34.8) 11 (21.5) 7 (17.9) 34 (25.0)
virD2 19 (41.3) 10 (19.6) 15 (38.4) 44 (32.3)
xerT 21 (45.6) 20 (39.2) 18 (46.1) 59 (43.3)
ctkA 14 (30.4) 15 (29.4) 10 (25.6) 39 (28.6)
Incomplete tfs3 9 (19.5) 15 (30.0) 13 (33.3) 37 (27.2)
Complete tfs3 14b (30.4) 6 (11.7) 5 (12.8) 25 (18.4)
Complete tfs3 and ctkA 7 (15.2) 5 (9.8) 1 (2.5) 12 (8.8)
Incomplete tfs3 and cagPAI 9 (19.5) 13 (25.5) 11 (28.2) 33 (24.3)
Complete tfs3 and cagPAI 13a,b (28.2) 5 (9.8) 3 (7.7) 21 (15.4)

aIndicated significant difference in prevalence between DU and CG at P < 0.05.

bIndicated significant difference in prevalence between DU and NCGC at P < 0.05.