Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 12;11:632192. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.632192

TABLE 1.

The impact of age structure on COVID-19 total cases in April 2020.

Independent variables GLM1,2 GMM3,4,5 Quantile (25)6,7,8
Median age 7.91 (1.13) [6.98] {0.00} 6.80 (1.40) [4.84] {0.00} 0.35 (0.26) [1.34] {0.18}
Quantile (50)6,7,8
1.60 (0.28) [5.66] {0.00}
Quantile (75)6,7,8
5.88 (0.98) [5.98] {0.00}
Aged-65_older 27.40 (3.19) [8.58] {0.00} 2 3.46 (3.70) [6.32] {0.00} 2.41 (1.14) [2.11] {0.03}
Quantile (50)6,7,8
8.97 (1.39) [6.40] {0.00}
Quantile (75)6,7,8
24.51 (4.96) [4.93] {0.00}
Aged-70_older 43.17 (4.85) [8.89] {0.00} 37.47 (5.71) [6.56] {0.00} 3.73 (1.79) [2.08] {0.03}
Quantile (50)6,7,8
15.42 (2.19) [7.01] {0.00}
Quantile (75)6,7,8
42.66 (5.66) [7.53] {0.00}

1By Newton-Raphson-Marquardt steps. 2The coefficient covariance is computed using observed Hessian. 3Estimation weighting matrix: HAC (Bartlett kernel, Newey-West fixed bandwidth = 5.0000). 4Standard errors and covariance are computed following the estimation weighting matrix. 5Instrument specification: total-cases-per-million (−1). 6Sparsity methods: Kernel (Epanechnikov) using residuals. 7Bandwidth methods: Hall-Sheather. 8Estimation successfully identifies the unique optimal solution. () shows standard errors, and {} denotes probability values.