Abstract
Background
The presence of a foreign body in the common bile duct (CBD) is a rare phenomenon. Thus, the route and mechanism of its migration remain difficult to fully clarify, especially for cases that occur after gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction. Herein, we present a case of a CBD stone that formed around a fish bone as a nidus subsequent to distal gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction.
Case presentation
A 70-year-old man was admitted to our hospital due to repeated episodes of epigastralgia. He had undergone distal gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction for gastric cancer approximately 10 years prior. Blood tests revealed obstructive jaundice, hepatobiliary dysfunction, and inflammation. Multi-plane reconstructed computed tomography (CT) revealed a CBD stone with a needle-shaped calcification density at the center, oriented along the length of the CBD. Surgery was performed using an upper median laparotomy approach. Lithotomy with choledochotomy was performed to remove one fragile bilirubin stone that had formed around a 3-cm, needle-shaped fish bone. A choledochoduodenal fistula was not detected intraoperatively. A review of the imaging of a prior examination revealed that the formation of the CBD stone around the fish bone was observable on a follow-up CT performed approximately 2 years prior. However, no clinical symptoms associated with the migration of the fish bone to the CBD were reported and the fish bone was not detected at that time.
Conclusion
In this case, transpapillary migration of the fish bone could only be speculated in the absence of an observable fistula, choledochostomy, or any clinical symptoms. Our case is clinically relevant as cholangitis developed after CBD stone formation around the fish bone that acted as a nidus.
Keywords: Foreign body, Fish bone, Common bile duct stone, Gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y reconstruction
Background
The presence of foreign bodies in the common bile duct (CBD) is a rare phenomenon. Although reports of such cases are gradually increasing, the route and mechanism of migration of such foreign bodies into the CBD remain to be clarified. Additionally, there are no reports about the length of time required to form a stone after foreign body migration into the CBD. As such, there is a need for more case reports to be accumulated and discussed. Herein, we present a case of a CBD stone that formed around a fish bone as a nidus after distal gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction.
Case presentation
A 70-year-old man was admitted to our hospital for obstructive jaundice. He had undergone distal gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction for gastric cancer concomitant with cholecystectomy for cholecystolithiasis approximately 10 years prior at a different hospital. The pathological staging of his gastric cancer was SS, N0, M0, stage IB. Gastric cancer recurrence was not detected during postoperative surveillance by computed tomography (CT) imaging or blood examination (Fig. 1a). In November 2016, further examination for repeated episodes of epigastralgia revealed the presence of obstructive jaundice. The patient’s serum total and direct bilirubin levels were 4.2 and 2.4 mg/dL, respectively. Moreover, hepatobiliary dysfunction was detected and the patient’s serum alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and gamma-glutamyl transferase levels were 474 IU/L, 264 IU/L, 496 IU/L, and 676 IU/L, respectively. C-reactive protein was elevated at 11.2 mg/dL. CT examination revealed CBD dilatation with a high-density area (Fig. 1d). On a series of surveillance CT images, a spotted high-density area in the CBD was confirmed in a retrospective analysis following the onset of cholangitis (Fig. 1b, c). Multi-plane reconstructed (MPR) CT revealed a CBD stone along the length of the CBD that contained a needle-shaped calcification density at its center (Fig. 2). The patient was diagnosed as acute cholangitis concomitant with CBD stone. Gastroenterologists at our center and from a nearby hospital deemed that it would be difficult and tentative to perform endoscopic therapy to remove the stone through the Roux-en-Y reconstructed intestine. Therefore, the surgical procedure was adopted as quick and reliable treatment option and was performed using the upper median laparotomy approach. A severe adhesion, resulting from prior surgeries (namely distal gastrectomy and cholecystectomy), was found between the liver and the hepatoduodenal ligament. Even though the CBD was carefully exposed to adhesiolysis, a choledocoduodenal fistula was not detected. Lithotomy with choledochotomy was performed to remove one fragile bilirubin stone that had formed around a 3-cm, needle-shaped fish bone (Fig. 3). The choledochotomy was closed by interrupted sutures using a polyglactin 910 suture. CBD drainage was not performed. The needle-shaped foreign body was diagnosed as a fish bone by histological hematoxylin and eosin staining and infrared absorption spectrophotometry (Fig. 4). The patient’s postoperative course was uneventful and free of adverse events. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 21. No recurrence of a CBD foreign body was identified over the 4 years since the surgery.
Fig. 1.
The time series of the surveillance computed tomography (CT) after gastrectomy. In 2012, 7 years after the patient underwent distal gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction for gastric cancer, the common bile duct (CBD) stone was not detected (a). In 2015, at the past CT scan review, a spotted high-density area was recognized (b). The stone formation was also recognized in 2016, although the patient had no symptoms (c). CBD dilatation with stone formation causing obstructive jaundice was detected in 2017 (d)
Fig. 2.

The coronal plane computed tomography (CT) image showing a common bile duct (CBD) stone along the length of the CBD, with a needle-shaped calcification density at the center
Fig. 3.
The extracted common bile duct (CBD) stone. Insoluble calcium salts aggregated and formed stones around the fish bone that acted as a nidus (a). The fish bone was approximately 3 cm in length (b)
Fig. 4.

Histological hematoxylin–eosin (HE) staining of the needle-shaped foreign body. The bone matrix that was constructed with collagen fibers was dyed red with hematoxylin
Discussion
In this case, we confirm the possibility of a CBD stone forming around a fish bone as a nidus. Moreover, in the absence of an observable fistula, the fish bone was assumed to have migrated into the CBD, although the route and mechanism of this migration remain to be clarified.
We summarize previously published cases on CBD foreign bodies in Japan. We identified 54 reports (of 63 cases) that identified the following causes: iatrogenic (42/63, 66.7%), oral ingestion (17/63, 27.0%), extracorporeal penetration (1/63, 1.6%), and parasites (3/63, 4.8%). In the world, foreign bodies introduced by ingestion have included toothpicks [1, 2], needles [3], fish bones [4, 5], chicken bones [6], and plant fibers [7, 8]. Due to the high fish consumption in Japan, a fish bone was the most identified foreign body in the CBD in 16 cases, including our case [4, 9–19], and plant fiber in one cases [20] (Table 1).
Table 1.
The 16 cases of fish bones in the common bile duct reported in Japan
| No. | Author | Year | Age | Sex | Chief complaints | Previous disease and interventional treatment or surgery | Interval time of migration (years) | length of fish bone (mm) | Therapeutic procedures for CBD stone | Possible pathway of migration to CBD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Morimoto | 2018 | 73 | F |
Rt. hypochondralgia Back pain |
None | – | 35 | EST | Through the papilla by chance |
| 2 | Sakakida | 2018 | 78 | F |
Fever Epigastric pain |
Duodenal carcinoma Pancreaticoduodenectomy |
9 | 20 | Single-balloon endoscopic lithotomy | Choledochojejunostomy |
| 3 | Koga | 2018 | 71 | M | Fever |
Cholangiocarcinoma Pancreaticoduodenectomy |
1 | Not specified | Double-balloon endoscopic lithotomy | Choledochojejunostomy |
| 4 | Bamba | 2017 | 71 | M |
Fever Liver dysfunction |
Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm Pancreaticoduodenectomy |
2 | 25 | Single-balloon endoscopic lithotomy | Choledochojejunostomy |
| 5 | Kuga | 2016 | 63 | M |
Fever Epigastric pain |
Perforation of juxtapapillary duodenal diverticulum Pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy |
5 | 19 | Laparotomy | Choledochojejunostomy |
| 6 | Araya | 2016 | 79 | F |
Epigastric pain Jaundice |
None | – | 15 | EST | Not specified |
| 7 | Hori | 2016 | 70 | M |
Consciousness disturbance Fever |
1. Distal gastrectomy, Billroth II reconstruction 2. CBD stone, choledochoduodenostomy |
40 5 |
25 | Laparotomy | Choledocoduodenostomy |
| 8 | Yoshida | 2010 | 73 | M |
Rt. upper abdominal pain Fever |
CBD stone, EST | 3 | 40 | EST | Through the papilla (post-EST) |
| 9 | Yoshida | 2005 | 77 | M | Rt. hypochondralgia | None | - | 38 | Endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation | Through the papilla by chance |
| 10 | Kaji | 2004 | 83 | M | Jaundice | None | - | 30 |
Laparotomy Choledochotomy |
Temporary choledochoduodenal fistula |
| 11 | Watanabe | 1999 | 74 | F | Fever (ampulla carcinoma of Vater) | None | - | 30 |
Laparotomy Pancreaticoduodenectomy |
Through the papilla by chance |
| 12 | Sakai | 1997 | 69 | M | Rt. hypochondralgia | CBD stone, EST | 1 | 32 and 44 | Endoscopic lithotomy | Through the papilla (post-EST) |
| 13 | Kakiuchi | 1989 | 63 | M | Epigastric pain | Gastric cancer, gastrectomy | 16 | 25 |
Laparotomy Choledochotomy |
Through the papilla by chance |
| 14 | Kato | 1985 | 84 | M |
Epigastric pain Vomiting |
Gastric ulcer, gastrectomy | 30 | 40 |
Laparotomy Choledochotomy |
Not mentioned |
| 15 | Sato | 1980 | 60 | F |
Epigastric pain Jaundice |
Gastric ulcer, gastrectomy, Billroth II reconstruction | 10 | 50 |
Laparotomy Choledochotomy |
Not mentioned |
| 16 | Our case | 2017 | 70 | M | Epigastric pain |
Gastric cancer Distal gastrectomy, Roux-en Y reconstruction |
2 | 32 |
Laparotomy Choledochotomy |
Through the papilla by chance (speculated) |
The interval time of migration is defined as the time interval for the migration after a previous interventional treatment or surgery and is shown as the number of years
F female, M male, Rt right, CBD common bile duct, EST endoscopic sphincterotomy
Choledochoduodenal fistulae and post-biliary jejunostomies have been reported as routes of foreign body migration into the CBD [1, 5]. Other possibilities include direct access by needle-shaped objects, such as a fish bone [1, 4, 7], transhepatic migration [21], and transpapillary regurgitation [2, 3, 8, 10, 22, 23]. There is also the possibility of excretion of foreign bodies from the liver into the bile duct, as shown in a case of a shrapnel splinter in the right thoracic cavity that migrated into the CBD through the diaphragm and liver [24]. Foreign bodies could also migrate into the CBD through the papilla, as shown by cases in which soft material impaction, such as plant stems or fibers and a chicken bone, in the duodenal papilla was the contributing source of the CBD foreign body [6, 8, 20].
In our case, after distal gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y reconstruction, severe adhesions were found between the residual stomach and liver, as well as around the duodenal stump and hepatoduodenal ligament, although there was no fistula or jejunostomy. Additionally, no previous duodenal papillae treatment had been performed. Thus, besides the transpapillary route, transient gastrohepatic, and duodenal biliary fistulae were considered as possible causes but with no conclusive evidence. During the clinical course, since the fish bone migrated into the bile duct, there were no specific abnormalities, such as pain or inflammation associated with perforation. As such, we considered transpapillary foreign body migration as the most likely route of migration, as previously described [25]. In six cases (37.5%) reported in Japan, migration through the duodenal papilla was considered [10, 15–19]. The introduction of an ingested foreign body into the bile duct via reflux should also be considered, regardless of duodenal papilla treatment [7, 10]. In cases of post-gastrectomy, abnormal motility of the sphincter of Oddi has been observed by severing the intrinsic neural connection from the stomach at the proximal duodenum. As evidenced by the paradoxical response to cholecystokinin, post-gastrectomy sequelae may stimulate the contraction of the sphincter of Oddi. But it has not been clarified how a motor disorder of the sphincter of Oddi is related to regurgitation [26]. A study investigating reflux of oral contrast agents into the bile ducts during magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography identified prior intervention to the duodenal papilla, parapapillary diverticulum, and pneumobilia as risk factors for reflux, although gastrectomy was not associated with the development of reflux [27].
Once the physiological analysis is completed, it is followed by the anatomical analysis. As several of the ingested foreign bodies reported to date have a thin needle-like shape and are approximately a few centimeters long, we hypothesize that they may be easily caught in the duodenal folds by peristalsis when passing through the curvature of the duodenum. Given that the duodenum is fixed to the retroperitoneum, the shape of the duodenum is almost flat in the direction of the papillary side of the small curvature, opposite to the greater curvature. Therefore, a long and thin object, such as a fish bone, that moves along a diagonal line in the major axis of the duodenal may unexpectedly be caught in the duodenal papilla.
Several hypotheses have been put forth as to why a fish bone is not expulsed from the CBD. The tip of the fish bone may have become lodged in the wall of the bile duct, subsequently being pushed into the bile duct by peristalsis, even if exposed to the duodenal papilla. Bile stasis might also be an associated factor. However, clear research evidence regarding these routes is needed. There is also the possibility of reflux into the afferent loop due to distal intestine stenosis or obstruction; however, such symptoms were not observed in our patient. Migration of the foreign body from the afferent loop to the duodenum, insertion into the duodenal papilla, and its persistent location in the bile duct appear to be coincident.
In our case, a retrospective review of prior images identified that the process of CBD stone formation around the fish bone took approximately 2 years. The fish bone initially stagnated in the CBD, without stone formation, for the first year. Subsequently, a CBD stone gradually grew around the fish bone and finally became incarcerated for approximately 2 years, causing acute cholangitis. Prior studies have shown the potential for food-based foreign bodies in the CBD to act as a nidus for stone formation, making excretion difficult [1, 9]. In our case, the stone that formed around the fish bone was formed of ocher bilirubinate. Bilirubin becomes deconjugated by the bacterial infection associated with cholestasis, resulting in the aggregation of poorly soluble calcium salts that led to stone formation around the fish bone [23]. Stone formation associated with a bacterial infection in the CBD is suggestive of reflux from the duodenal papillae.
In various reports, CT imaging has been useful to identify aspirated fish bones [9, 12, 28]. In our case, the fish bone in the CBD was visible on coronal plane MPR CT images performed at the onset of the cholangitis. On images of the axial plane CT, only a dot-like high-density area was observable, even though it could not be confirmed as an abnormality as the patient did not develop any symptoms. In particular, it was difficult to detect the very small spotted high-density area on the axial plain, which was performed before the cholangitis as a periodical examination. Today, owing to improvements in CT processing speed and resolution, CT reconstructed imaging could be routinely performed in cases with biliary system abnormalities.
Although endoscopic treatment is currently a well-established procedure, the patient would more likely be treated initially by single- or double-balloon endoscopy [9, 12]. However, this would have been technically difficult to perform in our case due to the altered anatomy following the Roux-en-Y reconstruction. The success rate of reaching the duodenal papilla would still be low especially in the presence of a residual stomach, and shortly after the introduction of the new procedure at the institution. Therefore, we proceeded with open surgery as the more reliable treatment option during which severe adhesions were carefully dissected, although the procedure itself was the same as for normal bile duct stones and, therefore, there were no safety issues.
In our case, as a clinical experience, there was a progression from the invasion of the fish bone into the CBD to stone formation and the onset of cholangitis. However, though we speculate on a transpapillary pathway of migration of the fish bone into the CBD, there was no confirmatory evidence. There is a need to accumulate cases and experiences to improve our understanding of the process of foreign body invasion of the CBD.
Conclusions
We describe a rare case of a CBD stone that formed around a fish bone as a nidus after distal gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction. In this case, transpapillary migration of the fish bone was considered as the route of entry, in the absence of a fistula, choledochostomy, or any clinical symptoms. Our case is valuable because the process of cholangitis development was retrospectively observed after the CBD stone had formed.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Editage (http://www.editage.com) for English language editing.
Abbreviations
- CBD
Common bile duct
- FB
Foreign body
- CT
Computed tomography
- MPR
Multi-plane reconstruction
- HE
Hematoxylin–eosin
Authors’ contributions
KH wrote the manuscript and was the main surgeon. MO supervised the surgery, co-operated with the corresponding author. DK was the assistant to the corresponding author in the surgery. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
Not applicable.
Availability of data and materials
All data presented in this paper are available upon request.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This case report was approved by the institutional research board (Approval Number: 2021-01).
Consent for publication
The patient provided consent for publication of the case.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Ken Hirata, Email: ken-hi@wa2.so-net.ne.jp, Email: webmaster@hikari-hosp.jp.
Daichi Kawamura, Email: daichiggl@gmail.com, Email: webmaster@hikari-hosp.jp.
Masahiko Orita, Email: orita.masahiko@hikari-hosp.jp, Email: webmaster@hikari-hosp.jp.
References
- 1.Ban JL, Hirose FM, Benfield JR. Foreign bodies of the biliary tract: report of two patients and a review of the literature. Ann Surg. 1972;176:102–107. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197207000-00018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Brunaldi VO, Brunaldi MO, Masagao R, Silva C, Masuda H, Brunaldi JE. Toothpick inside the common bile duct: a case report and literature review. Case Rep Med. 2017;2017:5846290. doi: 10.1155/2017/5846290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Dias R, Dharmaratne P. Ingested foreign body in the common bile duct. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2012;17:31–32. doi: 10.4103/0971-9261.91085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kaji H, Asano N, Tamura H, Yuh I. Common bile duct stone caused by a fish bone: report of a case. Surg Today. 2004;34:268–271. doi: 10.1007/s00595-003-2670-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Orda R, Leviav A, Ratan I, Stadler J, Wiznitzer T. Common bile duct stone caused by a foreign body. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1986;8:466–468. doi: 10.1097/00004836-198608000-00018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Baldota S, Breach C, Murtuza B, el Houcheimi B, Darzi A, Hadjiminas DJ. Chicken bone injury of the common bile duct. J R Soc Med. 2000;93:84. doi: 10.1177/014107680009300213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lv GY, Qiu W, Yu Y, Li T. Development of hepatolithiasis due to a celery stalk retained within the bile ducts of the liver. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2016;98:e77–e78. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Prochazka V, Krausova D, Kod'ousek R, Zamecnikova P. Foreign material as a cause of choledocholithiasis. Endoscopy. 1999;31:383–385. doi: 10.1055/s-1999-36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sakakida T, Sato H, Doi T, Kawakami T, Nakatsugawa Y, Nishimura K, et al. A bile duct stone formation around a fish bone as a nidus after pancreatoduodenectomy. Case Rep Gastroenterol. 2018;12:69–75. doi: 10.1159/000486191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Morimoto Y, Fujita T, Mizuno T, Ito A, Nakano T, Hachisuka T, et al. A case of choledocolithiasis caused by fish bones that served as cores around which gallstones developed. Gastroenterol Endosc. 2018;60:1338–1343. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Koga Y, Soyama A, Kitasato A, Takatsuki M, Eguchi S. Fishbone migration in the intrahepatic bile duct after pancreaticoduodenectomy. ACG Case Rep J. 2018;5:e18. doi: 10.14309/crj.2018.18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bamba H, Nakata T, Sato Y, Shuhei T, Hiroto I, Takayuki I, et al. A case report of a bile duct stone whose formation was induced by a fish bone after pancreatoduodenectomy. Gastroenterol Endosc. 2017;59:62–67. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kuga T, Oka K, Inokuchi T, Ueda K, Yano Y, Fujii Y. A case report of the patient with foreign body (fish bone) in the intrahepatic bile duct after pylorus preserved pancreatoduodenectomy. Geka. 2016;78:1123–1127. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hori N, Matsuda T, Katsube R, Jeon U, Lee M, Yasuaki K, et al. A case of a fish bone detected in the upper bile duct after gastrectomy and choledochoduodenostomy. J Jpn Surg Assoc. 2016;77:2033–2038. doi: 10.3919/jjsa.77.2033. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Yoshida A, Ohba K, Morisaki T, Kenichi T, Naoyuki Y, Ken O, et al. A case of common bile duct stone caused by an ingested fish bone. Gastroenterol Endosc. 2010;52:265–271. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Yoshida A, Fujii T, Shibata N, Fumika O, Akinori M, Masaki T. A case of a fish bone in the common bile duct. Gastroenterol Endosc. 2005;47:2191–2196. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Watanabe T, Sukigara M, Shinozuka N, Tatsuo Y, Isamu K, Ryouzo O. A case of stone of the common bile duct caused by an ingested fish bone with an ampulla carcinoma of the Vater. J Jpn Surg Assoc. 1999;60:110–113. doi: 10.3919/jjsa.60.110. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sakai T, Kihara M, Wagayama H, Atsuya S, Mikio K, Yukihiko T. A case of recurrent choledocholithiasis due to foreign bodies (fish bones) after endoscopic sphincterotomy. J Jpn Soc Gastroenterol. 1997;94:143–147. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kakiuchi M, Iwai K, Akamine T, Sentou F. A case of common bile duct stone caused by a fish bone. J Clin Surg. 1989;44:1955–1957. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Takahashi M, Ishii H, Koizumi M, Susumu S. A case report of stones formation in the common bile duct due to a core of a plant. Jpn Soc Gastroenterol Surg. 1991;24:2433–2436. doi: 10.5833/jjgs.24.2433. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Carballo Rodriguez L, Ruiz Montesinos I, Jimenez Aguero R, Beguiristain GA. Hepatic abscesses secondary to a foreign body in the common bile duct. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2017;109:658. doi: 10.17235/reed.2017.4873/2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kim YH, Kim YJ, Park WK, Lee SK, Kwon JH, Woo SK. Fish bone as a nidus for stone formation in the common bile duct: report of two cases. Korean J Radiol. 2004;5:210–213. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2004.5.3.210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Cetta F, Lombardo F, Rossi S. Large foreign body as a nidus for a common duct stone in a patient without spontaneous biliary enteric fistula or previous abdominal surgery. HPB Surg. 1993;6:235–242. doi: 10.1155/1993/51546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Eguchi S, Matsuo S, Hidaka M, Azuma T, Yamaguchi S, Kanematsu T. Impaction of a shrapnel splinter in the common bile duct after migrating from the right thoracic cavity: report of a case. Surg Today. 2002;32:383–385. doi: 10.1007/s005950200058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wada Y, Sasao W, Oku T. Gastric perforation due to fish bone ingestion: a case report. J Gen Fam Med. 2016;17:315–318. doi: 10.14442/jgfm.17.4_315. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tanaka M. Advances in research and clinical practice in motor disorders of the sphincter of Oddi. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2002;9:564–568. doi: 10.1007/s005340200075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sakamoto K, Shinagawa Y, Inoue K, Morita A, Urakawa H, Fujimitsu R, et al. Obliteration of the biliary system after administration of an oral contrast medium is probably due to regurgitation: a pitfall on MRCP. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2016;15:137–143. doi: 10.2463/mrms.2015-0044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Venkatesh SH, Venkatanarasimha Karaddi NK. CT findings of accidental fish bone ingestion and its complications. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2016;22:156–160. doi: 10.5152/dir.2015.15187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data presented in this paper are available upon request.


