Bacillus cereus |
Shear stress |
Biofilm density increased with an increase in shear stress, while the biofilm thickness decreased |
Lemos et al., 2015 |
P. aeruginosa |
Shear stress |
Shear acts as a cue for surface adhesion and activates c-di-GMP signaling, increasing the strength of bacterial adhesion |
Rodesney et al., 2017 |
E. coli |
Shear stress |
Low shear stress resulted in uniform biofilm growth while high stress resulted in biofilm growth from the edge toward the center of the channel |
Thomen et al., 2017 |
S. aureus |
Shear stress |
Increased shear stress increases EPS production, resulting in higher biofilm density |
Hou et al., 2018 |
Thalassospira strain |
Shear stress |
Flow velocity of 1.66 mm/s is the optimal rate for fast and strong biofilm adhesion, while too high shear stress prevented biofilm formation and removed adhered biofilms |
Liu et al., 2019 |
Actinobacillus succinogenes |
Shear stress |
Enhanced bacterial metabolic activities and biofilm viability under high shear condition |
Mokwatlo et al., 2020 |
E. coli and S. aureus
|
Shear stress |
Higher shear force was required to reduce bacterial adhesion on the hydrophilic surface compared with the hydrophobic surface |
Zhu et al., 2020 |
E. coli |
Laminar and turbulent flow |
Turbulent flow significantly reduced bacterial adhesion compared with laminar flow |
Fink et al., 2015 |
P. fluorescens |
Linear flow |
High flow velocities resulted in thinner biofilms with higher cell densities and contents of the matrix/extracellular polysaccharides |
Araújo Paula et al., 2016 |
E. coli |
Laminar and turbulent flow |
Laminar flow promotes biofilm growth over a 72 h period, while turbulent flow after 48 h causes reduction in biofilm biomass |
Oder et al., 2018 |
S. aureus and E. coli
|
Static and dynamic |
Greater reduction in bacterial adhesion to hydrophobic surfaces under flow conditions |
Hizal et al., 2017 |
F. nucleatum and P. gingivalis
|
Static and dynamic |
Loosely formed biofilm and reduced bacterial count were observed under the dynamic condition |
Song W.S. et al., 2017 |
Biofilm from human saliva |
Static and dynamic |
Biofilm viability in the static model was lower compared with the semi-dynamic model |
Santos et al., 2019 |