Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 12;9:643722. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.643722

TABLE 6.

Influence of fluid dynamics biofilm growth and characteristic.

Microorganism Flow conditions tested Influence on biofilm growth and characteristic References
Bacillus cereus Shear stress Biofilm density increased with an increase in shear stress, while the biofilm thickness decreased Lemos et al., 2015
P. aeruginosa Shear stress Shear acts as a cue for surface adhesion and activates c-di-GMP signaling, increasing the strength of bacterial adhesion Rodesney et al., 2017
E. coli Shear stress Low shear stress resulted in uniform biofilm growth while high stress resulted in biofilm growth from the edge toward the center of the channel Thomen et al., 2017
S. aureus Shear stress Increased shear stress increases EPS production, resulting in higher biofilm density Hou et al., 2018
Thalassospira strain Shear stress Flow velocity of 1.66 mm/s is the optimal rate for fast and strong biofilm adhesion, while too high shear stress prevented biofilm formation and removed adhered biofilms Liu et al., 2019
Actinobacillus succinogenes Shear stress Enhanced bacterial metabolic activities and biofilm viability under high shear condition Mokwatlo et al., 2020
E. coli and S. aureus Shear stress Higher shear force was required to reduce bacterial adhesion on the hydrophilic surface compared with the hydrophobic surface Zhu et al., 2020
E. coli Laminar and turbulent flow Turbulent flow significantly reduced bacterial adhesion compared with laminar flow Fink et al., 2015
P. fluorescens Linear flow High flow velocities resulted in thinner biofilms with higher cell densities and contents of the matrix/extracellular polysaccharides Araújo Paula et al., 2016
E. coli Laminar and turbulent flow Laminar flow promotes biofilm growth over a 72 h period, while turbulent flow after 48 h causes reduction in biofilm biomass Oder et al., 2018
S. aureus and E. coli Static and dynamic Greater reduction in bacterial adhesion to hydrophobic surfaces under flow conditions Hizal et al., 2017
F. nucleatum and P. gingivalis Static and dynamic Loosely formed biofilm and reduced bacterial count were observed under the dynamic condition Song W.S. et al., 2017
Biofilm from human saliva Static and dynamic Biofilm viability in the static model was lower compared with the semi-dynamic model Santos et al., 2019