Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 25;4(2):e2037632. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.37632

Table 1. Summary of Key Results for the Effects of Pharmacologic Interventions on Breathlessness in Patients With Advanced Cancer.

Comparison Evidence of difference Strength of evidencea No. of studies (No. analyzed) Key findings Conclusion
Placebo-controlled comparisons
Opioids vs placebo Equivalence Moderate 6 RCTs (N = 107); fentanyl vs placebo (4),16,17,18,19 hydromorphone (nebulized) vs hydromorphone (oral or subcutaneous) vs placebo (nebulized) (1),15 morphine vs placebo (1)20 Pooled analysis with Charles et al15; saline vs nebulized hydromorphone comparison: SMD, −0.12; 95% CI, −0.45 to 0.20; I2 = 0.0%, P = .43; pooled analysis with Charles et al15: saline vs systemic hydromorphone comparison: SMD, −0.14; 95% CI: −0.47 to 0.18; I2 = 0.0%, P = .49 Opioids were not more effective than placebo within the limits of the identified studies
Anxiolytics vs placebo Equivalence Low 2 RCTs (N = 311); buspirone vs placebo (1),21 midazolam vs placebo (1)31 Buspirone vs placebo: reported MBGD, −0.52; 95% CI, −1.045 to 0.005; midazolam vs placebo: no statistically significant difference between groups (P = .75) at 60 min; unable to calculate SMD, data presented as number of spray bottles rather than number of participants Anxiolytics were no more effective than placebo
Corticosteroids vs placebo No conclusion drawn Insufficient 1 RCT (N = 28); dexamethasone vs placebo (1)22 Calculated SMD, −0.06; 95% CI, −0.70 to 0.58 NA
Drug-drug comparisons
Opioids vs opioids Equivalence Low 7 RCTs (N = 132)15,23,24,27,28,30,32; subcutaneous vs sublingual morphine (1), subcutaneous vs nebulized morphine (1), high- vs low-dose sublingual fentanyl (1), low- vs high-dose opioids (drug unspecified) (1), hydromorphone (nebulized) vs hydromorphone (oral or subcutaneous) vs placebo (nebulized) (1), buccal fentanyl vs oral morphine (1), oral morphine hydrochloride vs oral morphine sulfate (1) Pooled analysis: SMD, 0.15; 95% CI, −0.22 to 0.52; I2 = 4.8%, P = .37 No difference in effectiveness between opioid doses or routes in improving breathlessness
Opioids vs anxiolytics Equivalence Low 2 RCTs (N = 108)25,26; oral morphine vs oral midazolam (1), subcutaneous morphine vs subcutaneous midazolam vs combination (1) For breathlessness intensity: 1 study found midazolam was more effective than morphine at 5 d (P < .001); another study found no significant differences between groups at 24 or 48 h; for categorical variable of percentage not experiencing breathlessness relief: calculated RR, 0.075; 95% CI, 0.004 to 1.270; calculated RR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.75 Opioids were not more effective than anxiolytics for improving breathlessness
Opioids vs corticosteroids vs bronchodilators No conclusion drawn Insufficient 1 Retrospective cohort (N = 343)29; morphine vs methylprednisolone vs aminophylline (1) Methylprednisolone vs aminophylline: calculated SMD, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.68; morphine vs aminophylline: calculated SMD, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.90 to 1.46; morphine vs methylprednisolone: calculated SMD, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.49 to 1.03 NA

Abbreviations: MBGD, mean between-group difference; NA, not applicable; RCT, randomized clinical trial; RR, relative risk; SMD, standardized mean difference.

a

Moderate strength indicates that further research may change the result; low strength indicates low confidence that the evidence reflects the true effect, and further research is very likely to change the result; and insufficient evidence indicates that evidence is unavailable or does not permit a conclusion.