Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 2;18(3):1356. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031356

Table 1.

Characteristics of included economic evaluations.

Author Country, Target Population Evaluation Type,
Study Design, Perspective, Time
Horizon
Reference Year, Discount Rate, Currency Intervention and Comparator
Supermarkets
Ball et al. 2016 [25] Australia,
socio-economically disadvantaged female shoppers
CEA, within-trial evaluation, societal perspective, 6 month intervention, 12 month follow up (6 months post intervention) 2012, NA, A$ I: Behaviour change intervention (education and skill-building materials)
C: Status quo
Le et al. 2016 [26] Australia,
female shoppers
CEA, within-trial evaluation, societal perspective, 3 months 2012, NA, A$ I1: Skill-building (non-retail setting)
I2: 20% price reduction on F&V, water and diet or low-calorie beverages at checkouts; and in-store promotion
I3: I1 and I2
C: Status quo
Cobiac et al. [32] Australia,
supermarket shoppers
CUA, modelled, health sector perspective, lifetime 2003, 3%, A$ I1: A$0.77 coupon to redeem on F&V, and in-store promotion
C: Status quo
Remote Community Stores
Magnus et al. 2016 [28] Australia,
2011 Australian Indigenous population
CUA, modelled, societal perspective, life-time 2011, 3%, A$ 20% price reductions for:
I1: All fruit
I2: Fresh vegetables only
I3: All vegetables
I4: All F&V
I5: Diet drinks and water
I6: All F&V, diet drinks and water
In-store nutrition education and 20% price reductions for:
I7: All fruit
I8: Fresh vegetables only
I9: All vegetables
I10: All F&V
I11: Diet drinks and water
I12: All F&V, diet drinks and water
C: Status quo
Magnus et al. 2018 [27] Australia,
population living in remote Indigenous communities in Northern Australia
CUA, modelled from trial data, partial societal perspective (including health and retail sector impacts),
life-time
2011, 3%, A$ I1: 20% price reduction for F&V, diet drink and water for 24 weeks
I2: I1 in combination with in-store nutrition education for 24 weeks
C: Status quo
Restaurants and Fast Food Stores
Gortmaker et al. 2015 [31] USA,
general population
CEA, modelled, societal perspective, 10 years 2014, 3%, USD I1: Menu calorie labelling in restaurants
C: Status quo
Allen et al. 2015 [30] England, adults >25 years CEA, modelled, societal perspective, 5 years 2015, 3.5%, GBP I1: Ban on trans fatty acids in restaurants
I2: Ban on trans fatty acids in fast food outlets
C: Status quo
CUA, modelled, societal perspective, 5 years
School Cafeterias
Gortmaker et al. 2015 [31] USA,
school children from kindergarten to grade 12
CEA, modelled, societal perspective, 10 years 2014, 3%, USD I2: Nutrition standards for school meals
I3: Nutrition standards for all foods and beverages sold in schools
C: Status quo
Ladapo et al. 2016 [29] USA,
low-income grade 6–8 students
CEA, within-trial evaluation, school perspective, 5 weeks 2014, NA, USD I1: School-wide environmental changes to promote water and healthy foods consumption; and physical activity (retail intervention included preparation of healthier food taste tests in cafeterias, other interventions included a peer leader club and school-wide multimedia marketing)
C: Status quo
Worksite Cafeterias and Vending Machines
Cobiac et al. 2010 [32] Australia,
worksite employees, cafeterias
CUA, modelled, health sector perspective, lifetime 2003, 3%, A$ I2-5: Each modelled intervention was based on a single published study. Each intervention included some or all of the following components: menu labelling, in-store nutrition education, changes to catering food policies and food labelling in cafeterias and vending machines
I6: Food demonstration in cafeterias, food labelling, special events (e.g., vegetable soup day), and provision of skill building materials (e.g., pamphlets and brochures)
I7: Display of information sheets near food products (e.g., caloric value of food translated to number of minutes to perform occupational activity) in cafeterias and vending machines
C: Status quo

Notes: A$: Australian dollar; BMI: body mass index; C: comparator; CEA: cost-effectiveness analysis; CI: confidence interval; CUA: cost-utility analysis; F&V: fruit and vegetable; GBP: British pound sterling; I: intervention; NA: not applicable; USA: United States of America; USD: American dollars.