Table 4.
Summary of the reviewed studies of digital impressions in implant dentistry.
| Author/Year | Study Setting | Type of Arch | Number of Implants | Implant System | Angulation of Implants | Depth of Implants | IOS Device |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Del Corso et al., 2009 [35] | In vitro | Edentulous | 5 | 3i Implant Innovations | Not reported | Not reported | Comet VZ250 (Steinbichler Optotechnik GmbH, Germany) |
| Papaspyridakos et al., 2012 [36] | In vitro | Edentulous | 6 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | - |
| Van der Meer et al., 2012 [19] | In vitro | Partially Edentulous | 3 | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | -CEREC Bluecam (Sirona, Germany) -iTero (Cadent, CA, USA)-Lava COS (3M, USA) |
| Patzelt et al., 2013 [37] | In vitro | Edentulous | 0 | - | - | - | -CEREC Bluecam (Sirona, Germany)-LavaCOS (3M, USA) -iTero (Cadent, CA, USA) -ZFX Intrascan (Zimmer, Dachau, Germany) |
| Andriessen et al., 2014 [8] | In vivo | Edentulous | 2 | Strauman Standard SLA-active | Not reported | Not reported | iTero (Cadent, CA, USA |
| Lee et al., 2015 [38] | In vitro | Partially Edentulous | 1 | Strauman BL | Not reported | Not reported | iTero (Cadent, CA, USA |
| Amin et al., 2016 [39] | In vitro | Edentulous | 5 | Strauman BL | Median 3 implants; 0° Distal left implant:10° distal Distal right implant: 15° |
Not reported | -CEREC Omnicam (Sirona, Germany) -True Definition (3M, USA) |
| Flugge et al., 2016 [31] | In vitro | Partially Edentulous | 2 and 5 | BL and TL | Not reported | Not reported | -iTero (Cadent, CA, USA)-Trios (3Shape, Denmark)-True Definition (3M, USA) |
| Giménez-González et al., 2016 [23] | In vitro | Edentulous | 6 | Certain implants Biomet 3i | #2 #4 #7 #15: 0° #4 #13: 30° |
#2 #4 #13 #15: 0 mm #7: 4 mm #10: 2 mm |
True Definition (3M, USA) |
| Papaspyridakos et al., 2016 [32] | In vitro | Edentulous | 5 | Strauman BL | Median 3 implants: 0° Distal left implant: 10° Distal right implant:15° |
Not reported | Trios (3Shape, Denmark) |
| Fluegge et al., 2017 [40] | In vitro | Partially Edentulous | 2 | S1 Camlog | Not reported | Not reported | - |
| Imburgia et al., 2017 [25] | In vitro | Edentulous and Partially Edentulous | 3 and 6 | BT Safe Int ®, BTK- Biotec Implants | 0° | Not reported | -CS3600 (Carestream, USA)-Trios3 (3Shape, Denmark) -CEREC Omnicam (Sirona Germany) -True Definition (3M, USA) |
| Menini et al., 2017 [41] | In vitro | Edentulous | 4 | Biomet 3i | Not reported | Not reported | True Definition (3M, USA) |
| Vandweghe et al., 2017 [42] | In vitro | Edentulous | 6 | IBT, Southern Implants | #46-44: 0,57° ° #44-42: 1,65° #42-32: 4,62° #32-34: 4,79 #34-36: 4,22° |
Not reported | -Lava COS (3M, USA) -True Definition (3M, USA) -CEREC Omnicam (Sirona, Germany) -Trios (3Shape, Denmark) |
| Ciocca et al., 2018 [43] | In vitro | Edentulous | 6 | Premium Kohno, Sweden and Martina | Not reported | Not reported | True Definition (3M, USA) |
| Ribeiro et al., 2018 [44] | In vitro | Edentulous | 4 | Klockner KL RP implants | Model 1: 0° Model 2: divergence angle of 15° between the more distal implants and convergence angle of 15° between the two central implants |
Model 1: 0 mm Model 2: 0 mm |
True Definition (3M, USA) |
| Gedrimieni et al., 2019 [45] | In vivo | Partially Edentulous | 2 | AnyOne Megagen | 10° | Not reported | Trios (3Shape, Denmark) |
| Arcuri et al., 2020 [46] | In vitro | Edentulous | 6 | Not reported | #16: 0° #14: 25° distal #12 #22: 0° #24: 20° distal #26: 20° distal 20° facial |
#16: 6 mm #14: 3 mm #12 #22 #24: 0 mm #26: 2 0 mm |
Trios (3Shape, Denmark) |
| Mizumoto et al., 2020 [47] | In vitro | Edentulous | 4 | TSV Zimmer Biomet | 0° | 3 mm | Trios (3Shape, Denmark) |
| Motel et al., 2020 [48] | In vitro | Edentulous | 3 | Nobelreplace Select implants, Nobel Biocare | Mesial Implant: 15° vestibular Central and Distal implant: 0° |
Not reported | Trios (3Shape, Denmark) |
| Revilla-León et al., 2020 [49] | In vitro | Partially Edentulous | 3 | RP Branemark system; Nobel Biocare | 0° | Not reported | - |