Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 14;17(2):108–113. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000770

TABLE 2.

Response of Participants Toward Use of Syringe Brake (N = 377)*

Survey Statements Disagree, n (%) Neutral, n (%) Agree, n (%) Mean ± SD
Ease of use
1  It is easy to fit Syringe Brake onto the syringe. 4 (1.1) 78 (21.1) 288 (77.8) 4.10 ± 0.76
2  It is easy to set the desired volume to be administered. 5 (1.3) 47 (12.6) 322 (86.1) 4.21 ± 0.72
3  It is difficult to learn how to use Syringe Brake. (reverse) 32 (8.6) 53 (14.2) 289 (77.3) 4.01 ± 1.02
Safety aspects
4  Syringe Brake allows the drug to be titrated safely. 8 (2.1) 49 (13.0) 319 (84.8) 4.26 ± 0.77
5  Syringe Brake gives users the confidence to avoid overdosing patient. 7 (1.9) 60 (16.0) 307 (82.1) 4.21 ± 0.78
6  Using Syringe Brake can prevent medication error when the user does not realize diluted morphine (10 mg/10 mL) 1 mg equates 1 mL. 14 (3.7) 59 (15.6) 304 (80.6) 4.16 ± 0.83
7  Syringe Brake can prevent wrong dose administration arising from miscommunication when the drug is prepared and administered by a different person. 19 (5.0) 83 (22.0) 275 (72.9) 3.96 ± 0.87
Efficiency
8  For a process that requires excess dose to be discarded before administration, e.g., discards 9 mL when only 1 mg is required, Syringe Brake saves time by removing the necessity to discard excess morphine. 26 (7.0) 95 (25.4) 253 (67.6) 3.86 ± 0.91
Acceptance
9  I am willing to use Syringe Brake. 14 (3.7) 71 (18.9) 290 (77.3) 4.08 ± 0.87
10  I prefer using Syringe Brake compared with the previous workflow. 23 (6.1) 108 (28.8) 244 (65.1) 3.90 ± 0.96
11  Overall, I am satisfied with the use of Syringe Brake to prevent medication error. 9 (2.4) 75 (20.1) 290 (77.5) 4.11 ± 0.83

*Numbers may not add to 377 because of missing data.