1 |
The patient’s RNA samples are collected from a throat swab and a specific enzyme is added to turn the RNA into two-stranded DNA |
RT-PCR |
If the patient’s both DNA results are positive, then the person is affected with COVID-19. The result ranges vary from 60–70% to 95–97% |
2 |
Sputum sample |
Molecular point-of-care |
Automated type of test results produced within 30 min |
3 |
Chest image |
CT |
CT-Based COVID-19 diagnosis results are better than those RT-PCR can offer (80–90%). But those of RT-PCR are on the low side of 60–70%. The problem with CT scan is the radiology person has to clean the scanners in between patients with a high risk of COVID-19 |
4 |
Chest image |
X-Ray |
X-Ray results are insensitive compared to those with CT scan. But compared to CT scan, X-ray machines are easier to clean |
5 |
Chest image |
Ultrasound CT |
The ultrasound CT scan result is better than the X-ray image. But ultrasound requires closer contact between the physician and the patient which may increase contamination risks for the staff |
6 |
Chest image |
PET-CT |
This technique takes more time to diagnose COVID-19 results compared to other methods |
7 |
Chest image |
CT |
AI-based CT assessment using deep learning principles to detect COVID-19 on chest CT scans. Gozes et al. report a sensitivity of 98.2%, but an impressive specificity of 92.2% for their deep learning-based thoracic CT algorithm. But the problem is some persons are infected with pneumonia with COVID-19. Alibaba used segmentation and quantification of lung infection regions to differentiate COVID-19–based pneumonia and other pneumonia cases with an accuracy of 96% |