Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 26;100(8):e24741. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024741

Table 1.

Basic information of the included literature.

Study Year Group (dose, mg) No. Female/Male Age, yr Outcome measures
01657370[13] 2012 Ub = 1 28 26/2 NA ①②③④⑤
Ub = 10 26 22/4
Ub = 25 28 23/5
Ub = 50 28 26/2
Ub = 100 27 18/9
Placebo 28 25/3
voss2016[14] 2012 Ub = 1 138 95/12 39.6 ± 10.7 ①②③④⑤
Ub = 10 139 92/16 41.1 ± 10.9
Ub = 25 139 91/13 41.4 ± 11.5
Ub = 50 139 92/14 40.7 ± 12.3
Ub = 100 139 90/12 41.9 ± 11.0
Placebo 139 99/14 40.8 ± 11.4
Lipton2019[15] 2018 Ub = 25 561 501/60 41.6 ± 12.3 ①②③④⑤
Ub = 50 562 497/65 41.0 ± 12.4
Placebo 563 494/69 41.5 ± 12.2
Dodick2019[16] 2017 Ub = 50 556 493/63 40.2 ± 12.0 ①②③④⑤
Ub = 100 557 479/78 40.7 ± 12.4
Placebo 559 491/68 40.5 ± 12.2
Goadsby2019[17] 2018 Ub = 100 260 140/116 NA ①②③④⑤
Placebo 256 141/119

NA = not available, Ub = ubrogepant; ① percentage of participants reporting pain relief at 2 h postdose; ② percentage of participant reporting absence of photophobia at 2 h postdose; ③ percentage of participants reporting absence of nausea at 2 h postdose; ④ percentage of participants reporting absence of phonophobia at 2 h postdose; ⑤ common adverse effects.