Table 8.
Literature | Country | Sample size | Major artery (percentage) |
Prevalence of CAAs except MB and ectasias, no. (%) | Major CAA (no. %, artery) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Present study | Southwest China | 11,267 | RCA (60.58) | 79 (0.7) | MB (1,060, 9.41, LAD) Origin (43, 0.38, RCA)∗ |
Pan et al. [6] | Xinjiang, Chinese Han, Chinese Uyghur | 4746 1934 |
111 (2.34) 76 (3.93) |
Origin (23, 0.48, RCA) Origin (19, 0.98, RCA) |
|
Altin et al. [4] | Turkey | 5548 | RCA (81.6) | 78 (1.4) | Origin (68, 1.2, LMA) |
Cademartiri et al. [14] | Netherlands | 543 | RCA (86.6) | 46 (8.47) | MB (59, 10.86, LAD) Origin (18, 3.3, LMA)∗ |
Aydinlar et al. [15] | West Turkey | 12,059 | 100 (0.8) | Origin (48, 0.40, LMA) | |
Safak et al. [16] | Izmir, Turkey | 16,768 | 120 (0.7) | Origin (86, 0.51, LMA) | |
Göl et al. [17] | Turkey | 58,023 | 257 (0.4) | Origin (203, 0.35, LCX) | |
Kardos et al. [18] | Hungary | 7694 | 103 (1.3) | Origin (98, 1.27, LAD) | |
Garg et al. [19] | India | 4100 | 39 (1.0) | Origin (35, 0.85, RCA) | |
Zheng et al. [20] | Nanjing, China | 1879 | Origin (24, 1.3, RCA) |
∗According to the modified classification [13], myocardial bridge and coronary ectasias were excluded.