Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 22;14:493–511. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S295549

Table 1.

Summary of Included Studies Using SPIDER Tool Categories

Study Sample Phenomenon or Intervention Design/Evaluation Research
Allen et al, 200436 (United States) No sample described. Comprehensive, MDT post-discharge care management model used in an ongoing study. Descriptive report of the rationale and theoretical basis for a randomized trial. Quantitative
Baker & Wellman, 200550 (United States) Hospital case managers (n=84). Identification of discharge planning concerns regarding patient nutrition and need for dietician. Survey with 86 questions and 6 case scenarios. SPSS for data analysis. Quantitative
Bleijlevens et al, 200851 (The Netherlands) Outpatients (n=333). Primary care staff (n=8). Process evaluation of a primary care MDT falls prevention program. Survey, structured phone/face-to-face interview and plenary group discussion. Mixed methods
Christie et al, 201652 (United Kingdom) Outpatients (n=45) and caregivers (n=18). Primary care staff (n=40). Service provider and patient experiences and views about post-hospital care and PCP role. A multi-center longitudinal study with qualitative semi-structured face-to face and phone interview. Thematic analysis. Quantitative not provided. Qualitative
Dossa et al, 201253 (United States) Outpatients (n=9) and caregivers (n=9). Identification of patient/caregiver experience and care transition failures from hospital to home. Longitudinal study using convenience sample. Thematic analysis. Qualitative
Fleiger et al, 201937 (United States) Hospital/primary care staff (n=18). Exploration of payment and delivery system reform to improve coordination/communication Case Study Design. Semi structured in-depth interviews. Thematic analysis. Qualitative
Hansson et al, 201754 (Sweden) Hospital/primary care and patient/caregivers (n=24). Healthcare professionals’ experience of patient, caregiver and healthcare provider collaboration. Purposive sampling for three focus group interviews. Qualitative
Hawes et al, 20185 (United States) Outpatients (n=268) Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary outpatient-based transition program. Descriptive statistics to summarize patient and process characteristics. Quantitative
Hesselink et al, 201438 (The Netherlands) Hospital/primary care staff, patient/caregivers (n=321). Intervention Mapping Model to improve patient discharge process and reduce readmissions. Description of model. 26 focus groups and 321 individual interviews. Qualitative
Holmes et al, 201639 (New Zealand) Hospital staff (n=42). Inpatients (n=51). Allied Health introduced in hospital Emergency Department, working in interdisciplinary team. Descriptive retrospective report of a pilot study. Staff and consumer survey. Quantitative.
Hsiao et al, 201840 (United States) Team leaders of Acute, Ambulatory, Behavioral and Nursing Care (n=8). Community Health Partnership to improve coordination between hospital, nursing home and primary care for high-risk patients. Description of design/implementation of a complex care coordination program. Qualitative.
Ivanoff et al, 201855 (Sweden) Hospital/primary care OT, PT, SW, nursing and medical staff (n=46). Different professionals’ views and experiences of a comprehensive geriatric assessment. Purposive sampling for focus group interviews. Qualitative.
Johannessen & Steihaug, 201356 (Norway) Unit nursing, medical, OT & PT staff (n=24). Primary care staff (n=14). Role of professional collaboration in patients’ transitions home from hospital via transition unit. Semi-structured interviews and meeting observations. Systematic text condensation. Qualitative.
Kind et al, 201157 (United States) Inpatients (n=187). Rate of dysphagia recommendation omissions in discharge summaries for high-risk patients. Retrospective cohort design: SLP reports abstracted, coded, compared. Quantitative.
Massy-Westropp et al, 200541 (Australia) Hospital/primary care medical, nursing and allied health staff (n=82). Effectiveness of electronic data link to transfer information between hospital and primary care. Staff satisfaction survey SPSS analysis. Content analysis of two staff focus groups with independent facilitator. Mixed methods.
Mc Ainey et al, 201642 (Canada) 1st 18 month of referrals to Intensive Geriatric Service (n=692) Intensive Geriatric Services Worker role and impact on clients, caregivers and healthcare system. Chart audit analyzed with descriptive statistics. Naturalistic inquiry approach for phone interview inductive analysis. Mixed methods.
Miller et al, 201943 (United States) Sample not described. Protocol for advanced care coordination program between hospitals and primary care. Database will allow continuous audit of SW-led longitudinal care coordination. Quantitative
Rowlands et al, 201258 (Australia) Hospital medical staff (n=22) and PCP (n=8). Perceptions of quality, timeliness and format of patient information sent from hospital to PCP. Grounded theory approach. In- depth interviews with convenience sample. Qualitative
Rydeman & Tornkvist, 200659 (Sweden) Hospital/primary care nursing and SW (n=31). Experiences of the discharge process among different healthcare professionals. Phenomenological approach. Data analysis from 8 focus-group interviews. Qualitative
Tang et al, 201760 (United Kingdom) Hospital/primary care medical, nursing, OT & PT staff (n=17). Gaps in care for patients with memory deficits after stroke. Semi-structured face-to-face/phone interviews. Thematic analysis. Qualitative
Thomas & Siaki, 201744 (United States) Hospital/primary care nurses, IT, pharmacist, case manager, unit secretary and PCP (n=?). Analysis of discharge and rehospitalization rate to create action plans directed at reducing risks. ‘Healthcare Failure Model and Effects Analysis’ and ‘Project Re-engineered Discharge’ tool kits used to target risk priorities with stakeholder input Mixed method
Trankle et al, 201945 (Australia) Hospital/primary care nursing, medical, allied health, care facilitators, patient/caregivers (n=83). Investigation of the effectiveness of an integrated care program. Qualitative evaluation using a framework analysis, with 125 in-depth interviews over 12 months. Qualitative
Wilson K et al, 200561 (Australia) Nurse practitioners (n=9). Nurse practitioners experience of collaboration with allied health and PCP Descriptive exploratory study. Thematic analysis. Semi-structured interviews. Qualitative
Wilson S et al, 200446 (Australia) Hospital medical, SLP, SW, OT, PT & nursing staff (n=14). Patients (n=100) Videoconference compared to audioconference for MDT discharge planning. Randomized controlled trial. Two group comparison of two different methods of case conferencing. Staff satisfaction survey analysis process not described. Mixed methods

Abbreviations: PCP, primary care practitioner; MDT, multidisciplinary team; OT, occupational therapist; PT, physiotherapist; SLP, speech & language pathologist; SW, social worker; IT, information technology; EMR, electronic medical record.