Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 27;11(2):165. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11020165

Table 3.

Clinical workflow of migraine subjects who developed NTG-induced headache attack and completed the study.

Subject ID Anamnestic Migraine Features ˄ Presence of Not Specific Headache after NTG Administration MRI Scan 1, Minutes Post NTG Premonitory Features at Prodromal Scan † MRI Scan 2, Minutes Post Induction NRS */ Pain Side at Full Blown « Migraine Features during Full Blown Scan ˄ Self Reported Resemblance with Typical Migraine Attack ~ MRI Scan 3, Minutes at Recovery after NSAID NRS * Recovery
EM1 0/0/1/1/1/1 1 80 0/0/0/1/0/0/0/0/0/1/0 200 7/R 0/0/1/1/1/1 1 85 1
EM2 0/0/1/0/1/1 1 31 1/0/0/1/1/0/0/0/0/0/0 140 5/R 0/0/1/0/1/1 1 50 0
EM3 1/1/1/1/0/1 1 110 0/0/0/0/1/0/0/0/1/1/0/0 155 6/L 1/0/1/1/0/1 1 70 1
EM4 1/0/1/0/1/1 0 38 1/1/0/0/0/0/0/1/0/0/0/0 70 8/B 1/0/1/0/1/1 1 95 0
EM5 0/0/1/1/1/1 0 65 0/0/0/0/1/0/0/1/1/0/0 105 6/B 1/0/1/1/1/1 0 106 1
Median 65 140 6 * 85 1 *

˄ 1 = presence of the characteristics of migraine attack: (0 = no; 1 = yes) nausea/vomiting/photophobia/phonophobia/aggravation by movement/throbbing pain. ∫ a specific headache: 1 = presence of transient olocranic headache after NTG administration, not resembling a migraine attack neither fulfilling ICHD-III criteria. † 1 = presence of prodromal signs or symptoms: (0 = no; 1 = yes) yawning/irritability/mood swing/sleepiness/tiredness/loss of appetite/food desire/nausea/stiffness/thirst/urinary retention. * NRS: numeric pain rating score 0–10 (mild: 1–3; moderate: 4–6; severe: 7–10). ~ 1 = self-reported resemblance between her/his typical migraine attack and the NTG-induced headache attack (0 = no; 1 = yes). « R = right; L = left; B = bilateral.