Skip to main content
. 2020 Autumn;11(4):355–369. doi: 10.22088/cjim.11.4.355

Table 2.

Characteristics of the BRAF screening studies included in the meta-analysis

Author Year Location Sex
(%men)
Mean age (%) Sample size (N) Tumor Stage*
1 & 2
Tumor Stage*
3 & 4
Tumor Location* (colon) Tumor Location* (rectum) Tumor Grade* (poorly) Tumor Grade* (Moderate) Tumor Grade* (Well) Method Total BRAF Mutation
(%)
Brim [43] 2008 Shiraz 64.0 59.80 53 23.0 77.0 NR NR 4.0 42.0 54.0 Sequencing 2.0
Dolatkhah 1 [48] 2014 Tabriz 76.7 61.77 30 36.6 46.7 NR NR 6.7 26.7 50.0 Sequencing 0.0
Dolatkhah 2 [49] 2016 Tabriz 65.0 61.90 100 37.0 29.0 72.0 28.0 3.0 22.0 49.0 Sequencing 0.0
Ghaffarpour [44] 2011 Tehran 37.0 61.30 27 59.2 40.8 NR NR 7.4 25.9 66.6 Sequencing 3.7
Javadi [45] 2014 Shiraz 55.0 59.80 100 66.0 34.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 17.0 83.0 Sequencing 0.0
Naghibalhossaini [50] 2011 Shiraz 65.4 NR 110 64.5 35.5 NR NR 43.6 40.0 4.5 PCR-RFLP/SSCP/ Sequencing 0.0
Mohammadi Asl [46] 2014 Ahwaz 45.0 44.25 80 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR PCR-RFLP/sequencing 46.3
Molaie [47] 2016 Tehran 56.4 51.00 85 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Sequencing 0.0
Payandeh 2 [51] 2015 Kermanshah 57.6 57.27 5 0.0 100 60.6 39.4 NR NR NR HRMA/AS-PCR/ pyrosequencing 0.0

N: Number, NR: Not reported, *: Percentage of all samples

N: Number, NR: Not reported, *: Percentage of all samples