Table 3.
Aims | Composition | Biomolecule Incorporated | Layer of Incorporation | Encapsulation Efficiency and Loading Efficiency | Release Profile | Ref |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Antibacterial activity | PCL/PVAc | CRV | Bottom layer | The CRV loaded in samples I and II was 3.0 ± 0.4 wt% and 2.3 ± 0.5 wt%, respectively | Sample I released about 45% of the total drug, while sample II released about 60% of the loaded CRV, at pH 8; after 7 days in basic pH the membranes were transferred to PBS pH 7.4 and after two weeks in this medium the release reached 60% and 85% of the loaded drug for samples I and II, respectively; after 14 days, the samples were put in an acidic medium where after one week the release reached 85% and 100% from the samples I and II, respectively | [66] |
(Sample I—PVAc in DMF/ETOH; sample II—PVAc in DMF) | Encapsulation efficiencies were 55 ± 5% and 43 ± 9% for samples I and II, respectively | |||||
PCL-HA/CS-ZN | SA | Bottom layer | N.A. | The release profile, in PBS (pH 5.5), consisted of a burst release in the first hour followed by a sustained release for 5 days (reaching approximately 16%) | [28] | |
PCL/PEO-CS | AV | Bottom layer | N.A. | N.A. | [67] | |
PCL-SF/SF-HA | THY | Bottom layer | Encapsulation efficiency of 79.7 ± 7.19% | THY release from the nanofibers, at both pH levels, comprises a burst release in the first 8 h after immersion in PBS, followed by a gradual release up to 24 h | [20] | |
Loading efficiency of 64.8 ± 5.42% | At pH 8, the release of THY reached a maximum of 91.87 ± 0.99% | |||||
At pH 5, the release of THY reached a maximum of 71.75 ± 2.06% | ||||||
PeCL/PDO | TiO2 nanoparticles (concentration of 3% (PP3T5T) and 5% (PP5T5T)) and TTC | Bottom layer | N.A. | The release profile of TTC, in PBS (pH 7.4), from PP3T5T showed an initial burst release of 47.2% within the first 6 h, followed by a slow release that reached 61.9% until day 4 | [69] | |
The burst release of TTC, in PBS (pH 7.4), from PPT5T5 was 50.8% within the first 6 h and reached 77% over 4 days | ||||||
PLLA-SS/PLLA | NFZ | Both layers | N.A. | The top PLLA-SS nanofibrous mats with 0.2% of NFZ, in PBS (pH 7.4) presented a fast release profile with more than 98% of NFZ detected in 10 min of incubation for every ratio | [71] | |
The PLLA bottom layer in PBS (pH 7.4) presented a more controlled and sustained release, reaching 17.6% after 48 h | ||||||
PLLA-SS(2:1)-0.2NFZ/PLLA-2NFZ, PLLA-SS(2:1)-0.5NFZ/PLLA-2NFZ, and PLLA-SS(2:1)-1.0NFZ/PLLA-2NFZ in PBS (pH 7.4) presented a burst release of 11.2%, 14.3%, and 28.4%, respectively, and the release amounts reached 29.4%, 43.0%, and 53.9%, respectively, after 48 h | ||||||
Wound healing improvement | PCL/CS | Mupirocin | Top layer | N.A. | The initial burst release of LID reached 66% in the first hours and increased gradually to 85% in the following 6 h, in PBS | [68] |
LID | Bottom layer | The release of mupirocin consisted in the release of 57% of mupirocin in the first 6 h, followed by a sustained release (30% was released in the following 114 h), in PBS | ||||
PeCL/Gel | Pio | Bottom layer | Loading efficiency of 56.16 ± 7.45% | The Pio release rapidly reached 40% in day 1 and a long-term release reached 75% in day 14, in PBS (pH 7.4) | [54] | |
PLA/PCL | VE | Both layers | N.A. | The asymmetric membrane showed a sustained release of VE over 21 days reaching a maximum of 78%, in PBS | [57] |
AV: Aloe vera; CRV: Carvacrol; CS: Chitosan; Gel: Gelatin; HA: Hyaluronic acid; LID: Lidocaine hydrochloride; N.A.: Not available; NFZ: Nitrofurazone; PBS: Phosphate-buffered saline; PCL: Polycaprolactone; PDO: Polydioxanone; PeCL: Poly(ε-caprolactone); PEO: Polyethylene oxide; Pio: Pioglitazone; PLA: Poly(l,d-lactic acid); PLLA: Poly(l-lactide); PVAc: Polyvinyl acetate; SA: Salicylic acid; SF: Silk fibroin; SS: Sericin; THY: Thymol; VE: Vitamin E derivative; ZN: Zein.