Table 5.
Sensitivity analysis of response rate
| Removed study | p | I2 (%) | Odds ratio (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| – | 0.38 | 7 | 2.12 (1.57, 2.85) |
| Chen Q [15] | 0.39 | 6 | 2.06 (1.53, 2.78) |
| Song WC [13] | 0.31 | 14 | 2.10 (1.54, 2.87) |
| Wang ZF [14] | 0.34 | 11 | 2.06 (1.51, 2.80) |
| Wu F [12] | 0.38 | 7 | 2.21 (1.62, 3.01) |
| Wang QZ [23] | 0.34 | 10 | 2.19 (1.61, 2.98) |
| Zhang YY [24] | 0.30 | 14 | 2.13 (1.56, 2.89) |
| Lv Y [16] | 0.30 | 14 | 2.11 (1.56, 2.86) |
| Shi HL [21] | 0.38 | 7 | 2.12 (1.57, 2.85) |
| Wang W [19] | 0.72 | 0 | 1.88 (1.37, 2.58) |
| Xun Yu [20] | 0.38 | 6 | 2.06 (1.52, 2.79) |
| Yang L [22] | 0.30 | 14 | 2.12 (1.57, 2.88) |
| Yang L [17] | 0.31 | 14 | 2.14 (1.56, 2.92) |
| Zheng X [18] | 0.32 | 13 | 2.07 (1.51, 2.84) |
| Hong S [25] | 0.73 | 0 | 2.50 (1.80, 3.47) |