Table 3.
Effect size (ES) and mean difference for total score of each functional status measure: comparison of post-acute care (PAC) and non-PAC cohorts.
| PAC Cohort (n = 455) | Non-PAC Cohort (n = 455) | PAC–non-PAC | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Measures | Before Rehabilitation | After 1-year Rehabilitation | ES of after Rehabilitation vs. before Rehabilitation | Before Rehabilitation | After 1-year Rehabilitation |
ES of after Rehabilitation vs. before Rehabilitation | Mean Difference (Estimate [95% C.I.]) * |
| BI | 44.7 | 64.0 | 0.82 | 46.0 | 63.3 | 0.65 | 0.17 (0.07, 0.27) |
| FOIS | 5.9 | 6.2 | 0.17 | 6.1 | 6.1 | 0.05 | 0.12 (0.09, 0.15) |
| EQ5D | 9.6 | 8.8 | −0.43 | 8.8 | 8.8 | 0.04 | −0.39 (−0.43, −0.34) |
| IADL | 2.0 | 3.1 | 0.85 | 3.1 | 3.3 | 0.71 | 0.14 (0.11, 0.16) |
| BBS | 20.6 | 29.9 | 0.57 | 18.4 | 24.9 | 0.42 | 0.13 (0.07, 0.19) |
| MMSE | 21.8 | 24.0 | 0.29 | 23.3 | 24.3 | 0.15 | 0.14 (0.11, 0.17) |
BI, Barthel Index; FOIS, Functional Oral Intake Scale; EQ5D, EuroQoL Quality of Life Scale; IADL, Instrumental Activities of Daily Living; BBS, Berg Balance Scale; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination. * Mean difference is presented as effect size (95% confidence intervals obtained by bootstrapping).