Table 3.
Correlation analysis of three types of mutation
| Comparison | CSA | CIA | CWN |
|---|---|---|---|
| Repeats and Substitutions | |||
| Correlation between repeats and substitutions (r) | 0.033 | 0.049 | 0.028 |
| Significance of correlation (t) | 0.103** | 0.103** | 0.145** |
| Coefficient of determination (r2) | 0.0011 | 0.0024 | 0.0008 |
| Indels and Substitutions | |||
| Correlation between indels and substitutions (r) | 0.207 | 0.435 | 0.165 |
| Significance of correlation (t) | 0.158** | 0.195** | 0.144** |
| Coefficient of determination (r2) | 0.043 | 0.189 | 0.0273 |
| Repeats and Indels | |||
| Correlation between repeats and indels (r) | 0.090 | 0.099 | 0.120 |
| Significance of correlation (t) | 0.195** | 0.221** | 0.268** |
| Coefficient of determination (r2) | 0.0081 | 0.0098 | 0.0145 |
Comparisons among the pairwise alignments (CSS taken as a Reference) to calculate the correlations between Repeats and Substitutions, Insertion-Deletions (Indels) and Substitutions, and Repeats and Indels. The alignments were partitioned into 630 nonoverlapping bins of 250 bp size each to calculate these correlations. ** indicated high significance. CWN ‘Wuyi narcissus’ cultivar of C. sinensis var. sinensis (natural triploid Chinary type tea), CSS C. sinensis var. sinensis (diploid Chinary type tea), CSA C. sinensis var. assamica (diploid Chinese Assamica type tea), CIA C. sinensis var. assamica (diploid Indian Assamica type tea)