Table 4. Results of Analysis of Variance for Gender and Rater Effect in Parental Estimates of Intelligence (N = 483).

Intelligence	Targets’ gender (F)	Effect size (${\mathrm{\eta }}_{\mathrm{p}}^2$)	Raters’ gender (F)	Effect size (${\mathrm{\eta }}_{\mathrm{p}}^2$)	Targets x Raters (F)	Effect size (${\mathrm{\eta }}_{\mathrm{p}}^2$)
Overall IQ	28.17*	.06	10.31*	.02	0.33	.00
Verbal/linguistic	5.68	.01	1.77	.00	4.71	.01
Logical-mathematical	92.09*	.16	0.16	.00	0.10	.00
Musical	0.11	.00	1.51	.00	1.83	.00
Body-kinesthetic	87.95*	.16	0.08	.00	0.61	.00
Spatial	109.52*	.19	3.78	.01	0.25	.00
Interpersonal	65.37*	.12	7.10*	.02	0.30	.00
Intrapersonal	10.84*	.02	8.11*	.02	4.82	.01
Naturalistic	0.07	.00	0.22	.00	0.51	.00

Note. F = F test for the effect of gender of a parents (targets), twins (raters) or targets x raters interaction; ${\mathrm{\eta }}_{\mathrm{p}}^2$ = partial eta squared for the effect size.

*p < .01.