Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 3;10(4):564. doi: 10.3390/jcm10040564

Table 2.

Perioperative details after inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW).

Perioperative Details HA (n = 41) Control (n = 200) Stddiff p
Perfusion time, min 110 (80 to 150) 138 (130 to 146) 0.365 0.327
Aortic clamping time, min 92.7 ± 83.1 106.4 ± 48.3 −0.202 0.308
IV inotropes before surgery 6 (14.2%) 39 (19.6%) 0.145 0.487
Aortic valve 33 (81.1%) 143 (71.3%) −0.230 0.258
Mitral valve 14 (35.3%) 95 (47.5%) 0.251 0.306
Tricuspid valve 1 (2.8%) 11 (5.6%) 0.137 0.393
Severe insufficiency 9 (22.8%) 61 (30.3%) 0.170 0.480
Procedure Groups 0.469
● CABG & Valve(s) 2 (3.7%) 19 (9.6%) −0.238
● CABG &Valve(s) & Other 1 (3.5%) 14 (7.2%) −0.168
● Valve(s) & Other 16 (38.3%) 75 (37.5%) 0.015
● Valve(s) only 22 (54.6%) 91 (45.7%) 0.179
Assist Device 0.141
● IABP 1 (3.0%) 10 (4.9%) −0.098
● ECMO 2 (4.1%) 1 (0.4%) 0.247

HA: hemoadsorption group; stddiff: standardized difference; IV: Intravenous; CABG: Coronary artery bypass grafting; IABP: intraaortic balloon pump; ECMO: extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Only one patient in the control group underwent concomitant surgery on pulmonary valve; so we did not analyze this variable using IPTW.