Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 3;13(2):499. doi: 10.3390/nu13020499

Table A1.

Comparison of epidemiological approaches to determine relationships between vitamin D and health outcomes.

Approach Method Strengths Weaknesses
Ecological,
geographical
Compare health outcomes with indices of solar UVB doses and other risk-modifying factors Can include large numbers of participants Subject to confounding factors; indices used may not apply to those with health outcomes
Observational,
prospective
Enroll participants, draw blood, obtain information, follow for a long period. 25(OH)D has inputs from solar UVB, diet, and supplements. 25(OH)D changes with time including season so effect decreases as follow-up time increases; control of confounding may not be complete.
Observational,
case-control
Measure 25(OH)D near time of diagnosis, match with controls. Appropriate when health outcome is affected by recent 25(OH)D or 25(OH)D changes little over time. Disease status may affect 25(OH)D; control choice may be biased.
Observational,
cross-sectional
Measure 25(OH)D and health status of a representative number of a population Many health outcomes can be studied. 25(OH)D may not be similar to that prior to health outcome; health status may affect 25(OH)D.
Non-randomized vitamin D supplementation Enroll participants, measure parameters, instruct. High vitamin D doses can be used; Confounding by self-selected use of supplements
RCT Enroll participants, randomize to vitamin D or placebo supplementation, follow. Effects found are likely due to vitamin D. False negatives are possible because enrollees often have high 25(OH)D or may be given low vitamin D doses; compliance issues; other sources of vitamin D occur. Initiation may be after onset of disease and duration may be too short to have an effect.
MR Measure alleles of genes that affect 25(OH)D levels. Independent of many factors including actual 25(OH)D. The alleles may not reflection biological activity, and confounding is still possible. Can be misleading when relationship of vitamin D is nonlinear, and statistical power can be low.

MR—Mendelian randomization; RCT—Randomized controlled trial.