Table 2.
Material | Printer | Structure Pattern | Parameters Studied | Effects on the Printed Products | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cereal | 3D printer Delta 2039 | Parallelepiped with internal cubes | - Void number (4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, and 12); - Void position |
- Pore size and position influence the printed products; - Porosity presents a negative influence on weight, moisture, and water activity; - Porosity influences hardness which decreases with the decrease in the relative density of the printed products; - Increase in dough porosity during baking (exterior to the model) accounts for the decrease in hardness. |
[62] |
Dough | 3D printer | Cube, Cone, and Sphere | - Compressive pressure (300, 400, 500, 600, and 700 kPa); - Needle velocity (3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 mm/s); - Needle diameter (0.25, 0.41, 0.58, 0.84, and 1.19 mm); - Infill levels (10, 30, 50, 70, and 100%) |
- Best printing results at 600 kPa, 6 mm/s printing speed, 0.58 mm nozzle diameter, and 50% infill level; - Addition of olive oil and mango powder causes a decrease in hardness but an increase in elasticity and resilience of the printed product; - The printing process leads to further reduction in the hardness, adhesiveness, elasticity, and resilience. |
[76] |
Dark chocolate | Printer with rotary extrusion (Porimy 1.0) | Cylinder with Star, Hilbert curve, and Honeycomb internal patterns | - Infill levels (5, 30, 60, and 100%); - Infill patterns |
- Infill level influences the weight of the printed product, which in turn influences the void on the structures; - Increasing infill percentage causes an increase in the weight of the prints and decrease the void fraction on the structures; - Increasing the infill level also increases the hardness of the products but even a 100% infill presents lower hardness than cast chocolate; - Star and honeycomb patterns provide the most stability and hardness at 60% infill to the printed results. |
[35,85] |
Brown rice with xanthan gum and guar gum | 3D Printer | Cylinder with crossing lines | - Nozzle diameter (0.84, 1.2, and 1.56 mm); - Perimeters (3, 5, and 7); - Infill level (15, 45, and 75%) |
- Nozzle diameter and perimeter affect the printed structures’ height and diameter; - All parameters positively impact the weight of the products; - Faster printing speeds can be achieved using wider nozzles at lower infill densities and perimeters, but can cause dimensional deviations; - All tested parameters affect the samples’ texture (hardness and gumminess), with the infill level exerting the biggest effect. |
[20] |
Yam and Potato | Dual nozzle extrusion printer (Shinnove -D1) |
Cylinder with Rectilinear, Wiggle, Triangular, and Honeycomb internal patterns | - Infill Level (20, 50, and 80%); - Infill patterns |
- Printed products present a slightly larger dimensional structure than the model; - Infill level influences the porosity, weight, texture, moisture content, hardness, and air-frying processing time; - Higher infill levels decrease the porosity and moisture and increase the weight, hardness, and air-frying processing time (12 min at 20% infill level, 16 min at 50%, and 24 min at 80%); - Infill patterns also influence the hardness of the products, with triangular structures presenting higher hardness at 50 and 80% infill. |
[103] |
Mashed potatoes | Dual nozzle extrusion printer | Cylinder with Rectilinear, Hilbert curve, and Honeycomb internal patterns | - Infill levels (10, 40, and 70%); - Number of shell perimeters (3, 5, and 7); - Infill patterns |
- Infill level, more than the other infill parameters (no effect with the pattern, and limited effect with perimeter), presents a strong influence on weight, void fraction, hardness, gumminess, firmness, and Young’s modulus; - Higher infill levels increase all characteristics except for the void fraction which decreases; - Even at 100% infill level, the printed samples present lower hardness compared to the cast samples. |
[65] |
Potato | 3D Printer | Cylinder with Rectilinear, Cubic, and Honeycomb internal patterns | - Infill patterns; - Infill levels (20, 50, and 70%) |
- Infill level and pattern both influence the printing time, extrusion rate, weight, hardness, and fracturability; - Higher infill levels increase all properties tested; - An increase in the infill level and complexity pattern increases the printing time. Longer times are needed to produce honeycomb structures and shorter for rectilinear. |
[104] |
Dark chocolate | 3D Printer (Shinnove -D1) | Rectangular with Rectilinear and Honeycomb internal patterns | - Infill levels (25, 50, and 100%); - Infill patterns |
- Infill levels influence the hardness of the samples. Increasing the infill also increases the force necessary to break the samples. | [71] |
Wheat dough | 3D printer Delta 2040 | Cylinder with crossing lines | - Infill levels (10, 15, and 20%); - Layer height (0.3, 0.4, and 0.5 mm) |
- Layer height positively influences structures’ diameter and negatively influences the solid matrix fraction and height of the printed snacks. Higher layer height results in a rougher visual aspect of the printed product; - Infill level positively influences the diameter, solid matrix fraction, and hardness of samples; - Cooking of the printed snacks leads to an increase in porosity and weight loss; - Samples printed with a 20% infill level and 0.3 mm of layer height show the highest moisture, hardness, and solid fraction. |
[105] |
Mashed potatoes and strawberry juice gel | 3D Printer | Cylinder with varied internal patterns (triangular, circle, hexagon, and square), a cube with varied layer disposition, and a cube with rectilinear lines | - Mashed potatoes volume ratio (7.44, 20.67, and 41.35%); - Infill levels (40, 60, 80, and 100%); - Infill patterns |
- Volume ratio of mashed potatoes influences the hardness and gumminess of the printed products independently of the internal pattern; - Infill levels influence the printing time and rate, hardness, fracturability, and weight of the printed products; - At higher infill levels there is an increase in the weight, printing time and rate, young’s modulus, hardness, firmness, and gumminess, and a decrease in adhesiveness of the printed structures. |
[75] |