Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 3;18(4):1414. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041414

Table 3.

Factors Associated with Dating Violence Among Girls Ages 13–16 From Alicante, Spain (n = 255), Rome, Italy (n = 285), Iasi, Romania (n = 343), Matosinhos, Portugal (n = 259), Poznan, Poland (n = 190) and Cardiff, UK (n = 204), 2018–2019 a.

Variable (Reference) Crude Model Adjusted Model
PR b CI c 95% p-Value PR b CI c 95% p-Value
Age 1.20 1.10 1.30 <0.001 1.08 0.95 1.23 0.268
Father’s employment (Paid work)
Unpaid work 1.61 1.20 2.15 0.001 1.39 1.05 1.85 0.024
Physical and sexual abuse in childhood (No)
Yes 2.13 1.71 2.65 <0.001 1.69 1.33 2.16 <0.001
Social Support
Teacher 0.98 0.97 0.99 <0.001 0.99 0.98 1.01 0.342
Parents 0.98 0.97 0.99 <0.001 1.00 0.99 1.01 0.741
Close friend 0.98 0.97 0.99 0.001 0.99 0.98 1.01 0.270
ASI d-Benevolent Sexism 1.01 1.00 1.02 0.143 1.01 1.00 1.03 0.025
ASI d-Hostile Sexism 1.01 1.00 1.03 0.024 1.00 0.99 1.01 0.907
MVQ e-Violence Acceptance 1.06 1.02 1.10 0.001 1.00 0.96 1.04 0.924
MVQ e-Machismo 1.04 1.02 1.05 <0.001 1.02 1.00 1.05 0.022
SPSI-Rf Problem-solving 0.99 0.98 0.99 <0.001 0.99 0.98 1.00 0.084

a Models adjusted by country. b Prevalence ratio; c Confidence interval at 95% level; d Ambivalent Sexism Inventory; e Maudsley Violence Questionnaire; f Problem-Solving Inventory-Revised Scale.