Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 3;18(4):1414. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041414

Table 4.

Factors Associated with Dating Violence Among Boys Ages 13–16 From Alicante, Spain (n = 255), Rome, Italy (n = 285), Iasi, Romania (n = 343), Matosinhos, Portugal (n = 259), Poznan, Poland (n = 190) and Cardiff, UK (n = 204), 2018–2019 a.

Variable (Reference) Crude Model Adjusted Model
PR b CI c 95% p-Value PR b CI c 95% p-Value
Age 1.14 1.02 1.27 0.019 0.86 0.72 1.02 0.084
Father’s employment (Paid work)
Unpaid work 1.11 0.67 1.84 0.693 0.99 0.61 1.61 0.956
Physical and sexual abuse in childhood (No)
Yes 2.03 1.49 2.76 <0.001 1.48 1.07 2.06 0.018
Social Support
Teacher 0.98 0.97 0.99 0.002 1.00 0.98 1.01 0.779
Parents 0.96 0.95 0.98 <0.001 0.97 0.96 0.99 <0.001
Close friend 0.98 0.97 0.99 0.004 1.01 1.00 1.02 0.212
ASI d-Benevolent Sexism 1.00 0.98 1.02 0.951 1.01 0.99 1.02 0.444
ASI d-Hostile Sexism 1.02 1.00 1.03 0.020 1.02 1.00 1.04 0.019
MVQ e-Violence Acceptance 1.01 0.96 1.06 0.795 0.92 0.87 0.98 0.009
MVQ e-Machismo 1.03 1.02 1.05 <0.001 1.04 1.02 1.07 <0.001
SPSI-R f Problem-Solving 0.99 0.98 1.00 0.110 1.00 0.99 1.02 0.594

a Models adjusted by country. b Prevalence ratio; c Confidence interval at 95% level; d Ambivalent Sexism Inventory; e Maudsley Violence Questionnaire; f Problem-Solving Inventory-Revised Scale.