Table 5.
Appropriate Recommendation Score | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
URIs | Diarrhoea | Wound | Total | |
Age 1 | ||||
Correlation | −0.22 | −0.24 | −0.20 | −0.33 |
p-value | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
Length of experience 1 | ||||
Correlation | −0.14 | −0.16 | −0.20 | −0.24 |
p-value | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.01 | <0.01 |
Gender 2 | ||||
correlation | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.21 | 0.19 |
p-value | 0.11 | 0.16 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
Education 2 | ||||
Correlation | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.13 | −0.16 |
p-value | 0.17 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.03 |
Role of pharmacist 2 | ||||
Correlation | −0.17 | −0.15 | 0.12 | −0.19 |
p-value | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.09 | <0.01 |
Type of pharmacy 2 | ||||
Correlation | 0.17 | 0.15 | 0.12 | 0.19 |
p-value | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.09 | <0.01 |
Accreditation status 2 | ||||
Correlation | 0.14 | 0.09 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
p-value | 0.04 | 0.19 | 0.52 | 0.61 |
Regions 2 | ||||
Correlation | 0.22 | 0.13 | 0.01 | 0.09 |
p-value | 0.70 | 0.06 | 0.91 | 0.22 |
1 Pearson’s correlation test, 2 Spearman’ rank test.