Table 2.
Number of Variables |
Without Spaces | Isomeric Space | Binding Space | Both Spaces Merged | Both Spaces Joint | Mean |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pIC50 > 5 | ||||||
1 | 7.1 | 9.0 (27%) a | 9.0 (27%) a) | 10.1 (41%) a | 9.0 (27%) a | 8.9 |
2 | 10.3 | 10.3 (0%) | 10.3 (0%) | 11.3 (10%) | 10.3 (0%) | 10.5 (18%) b |
3 | 10.3 | 11.8 (14%) | 10.3 (0%) | 11.3 (10%) | 11.3 (15%) | 11.1 (24%) b |
4 | 10.7 | 11.8 (10%) | 10.7 (0%) | 12.2 (14%) | 11.6 (10%) | 11.4 (28%) b |
5 | 10.7 | 11.8 (10%) | 11.6 (8%) | 13.0 (22%) | 12.0 (12%) | 11.8 (33%) b |
Mean | 9.8 | 10.9 (11%) | 10.4 (5%) | 11.6 (18%) | 11.0 (12%) | 10.7 (20%) b |
pIC50 > 6 | ||||||
1 | 9.4 | 10.9 (16%) | 9.4 (0%) | 9.4 (0%) | 10.9 (16%) | 10.0 |
2 | 13.4 | 14.1 (5%) | 13.4 (0%) | 14.6 (8%) | 14.1 (5%) | 13.8 (38%) |
3 | 13.4 | 15.1 (12%) | 13.4 (0%) | 15.6 (16%) | 16.7 (24%) | 14.8 (48%) |
4 | 14.1 | 15.1 (7%) | 18.2 (29%) | 17.2 (21%) | 18.2 (29%) | 16.6 (66%) |
5 | 14.1 | 15.1 (7%) | 18.2 (29%) | 18.2 (29%) | 18.2 (29%) | 16.8 (68%) |
Mean | 12.9 | 14.6 (9%) | 15.3 (13%) | 15.9 (16%) | 16.0 (20%) | 14.4 (43%) |
a Here and in the following rows, the performance enhancements are computed in respect to the first column reporting the EF1% values obtained without including space parameters to assess the beneficial role of the inclusion of these parameters and their combinations. The same holds for pIC50 > 6 and Tables 4, 6, and 8. b In the last column, the enhancements are computed with respect to the average value obtained by the single scoring functions to evaluate the average effect of the consensus models. The same holds for pIC50 > 6 and Tables 4, 6, and 8.