Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2020 Dec 1;24(12):1254–1260. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.20.0079

Table 1:

Demographic and TB-related characteristics of children with and without treatment delays

Children
with delay*
Children
without delay
n=11 n=15
Age, median [range] 2.5 [0.9-14.9] 5.3 [0.6-14.8]
Female sex, n (%) 5 (45%) 10 (67%)
Days from diagnosis to treatment initiation, median [range]** 26 [7-117] 1 [0-6]
Case status, n (%)
   Culture-confirmed TB 4 (36%) 6 (40%)
   Clinically-diagnosed, unconfirmed TB 7 (64%) 9 (60%)
Received a regimen other than HREZ, n (%)** 5 (42%) 1 (7%)
   Other regimen received n (%)
   PAS/AMK/CS/ETO/LFX 0 (0%) 1 (7%)***
   AMK/CS/ETO/LFX/PZA 1 (9%) 0 (0%)
   EMB/LFX/PZA/RIF 2 (18%) 0 (0%)
   CS/EMB/ETO/KM/LFX/PZA 2 (18%) 0 (0%)
*

Delay defined as time lapse of seven or more days between diagnosis to treatment start, as documented in the child’s medical record

**

N=25. One child with a TB treatment delay did not start treatment until after study closure. We were therefore unable to obtain data on date of treatment initiation and regimen.

***

This case represents an exception to committee review for drug resistant cases: due to known MDR-TB in both parents, that drugs happened to be available at the clinic and the attending physician was a member of the national committee of experts, the child was able to start treatment quickly