Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Addiction. 2020 Oct 1;116(4):914–925. doi: 10.1111/add.15238

Table 3.

Association of Frequency of Perceived Exposure to Discrimination with Deprivation-Induced Changes in Tobacco Withdrawal Outcomes

Tobacco Withdrawal Outcome Parameter Estimate for Association of Frequency of Perceived Exposure to Discrimination with Respective Outcome

Unadjusted Modelsa
β (95% CI)
p-value Adjusted Modelsb
β (95% CI)
p-value
Urge/Craving
 WSWS-Craving .04 (−.002, .01) .23 .02 (−.005, .01) .65
 QSU-Appetitive Urge .04 (−.003, .01) .22 .03 (−.005, .01) .36
 QSU-Aversive Urge .10 (.002, .02) .01 .10 (.002, .02) .02
Negative Mood
 POMS-Negative Mood .13 (.003, .01) .001 .11 (.001, .01) .008
 WSWS-Anger .12 (.005, .02) .002 .09 (.002, .02) .02
 POMS-Anger .16 (.004, .01) .0001 .13 (.003, .01) .002
 WSWS-Anxiety .12 (.004, .02) .001 .11 (.003, .02) .002
 POMS-Anxiety .13 (.003, .01) .001 .11 (.002, .01) .006
 WSWS-Sadness .10 (.002, .01) .004 .07 (−.0001, .01) .06
 POMS-Depression .14 (.003, .01) .0002 .11 (.001, .01) .008
Low Positive Mood
 POMS-Positive Mood −.06 (−.009, .001) .11 −.09 (−.01, −.001) .03
 SHAPS-Anhedonia .02 (−.002, .004) .64 .02 (−.003, .004) .71
Cognition
 POMS-Confusion .15 (.003, .01) .0001 .11 (.001, .01) .008
 WSWS-Concentration .09 (.001, .01) .01 .06 (−.001, .01) .12
 CIS-Impulsivity .10 (.001, .01) .01 .08 (−.0001, .01) .06
Other Withdrawal Symptoms
 WSWS-Hunger −.01 (−.006, .01) .86 −.04 (−.01, .003) .27
Smoking Lapse Behavior
 Time Delayed (min) .03 (−.09, .21) .41 .03 (−.11, .22) .50
 Cigarettes Smoked −.04 (−.01, .002) .22 −.05 (−.01, .002) .15

Note. Sample size varies across analyses (Ns = 582–607 due to missing data; see Table 2). WSWS = Wisconsin Severity of Withdrawal Scale; QSU = Questionnaire of Smoking Urges; POMS = Profile of Mood States; CIS = Current Impulsivity Scale; Time Delayed = Time to smoking initiation; Cigarettes smoked = Number of cigarettes smoked.

a

Unadjusted models controlled for non-deprivation value for respective outcome variable.

b

Adjusted models additionally controlled for gender, annual income, and IDAS general depression.

Statistically significant after Benjamini-Hochberg correction to maintain study-wise false discovery rate at .05.